Recent content by FNMwacki
-
F
Undergrad Heat Losses while boiling a pot of water
I'm sorry, I've edited some portions of previous posts but not others. I should have just left it alone and added another post. For surface areas i have: 16.125 inch diameter is a 1.344 ft diameter, .67 ft radius 23.375 inch height is a 1.95 ft height 1.42 sqft = ∏*(.67)^2...- FNMwacki
- Post #13
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
F
Undergrad Heat Losses while boiling a pot of water
I included it at 210 degrees because the water is not boiling but the evaporation loss is still there, this more or less told me the minimum i need to fire the element just to maintain 210F. (this is higher than the percent needed to boil when not including that radiation from the surface, i...- FNMwacki
- Post #11
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
F
Undergrad Heat Losses while boiling a pot of water
Generally people shoot for between 1gal and 1.25gal per hour boil off...so my assumptions are: 10 gallons heating volume 15.5 gallons heating vessel capacity 5500 watts from electric element 3.41 BTU/watt 23.375 inches keg height 16.125 inches keg diameter This gives me: 1.418 sqft for surface...- FNMwacki
- Post #9
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
F
Undergrad Heat Losses while boiling a pot of water
The keg is 23.375 inches high and 16.125 inches in diameter...thanks for your input, i kind of thought that was the case (that the boiling loss is or was close to the evaporation loss). edit: I also should mention that i scale the side surface area of the keg to the amount of water I'm heating...- FNMwacki
- Post #7
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
F
Undergrad Heat Losses while boiling a pot of water
That is exactly my next step (actually monitor losses while boiling), I just know that I live in a very dry climate that also effects the rate of boil off...my goal was to find a generic formula that might work for other ambient temps and humidity as a basis. Thanks all for your input!- FNMwacki
- Post #5
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
F
Undergrad Heat Losses while boiling a pot of water
Of course i don't NEED it :) I just like solving problems and getting as close as I can...and i totally understand this is a very compicated problem, I'm just looking for some guidelines to be as close as i can. Like I said, I'm brewing beer, people did it for thousands of years before...- FNMwacki
- Post #3
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
F
Undergrad Heat Losses while boiling a pot of water
Hi all, I'm a homebrewer and I'm trying to find the boil off rate in gal/hour when using an electric heating element in my kettle. If I'm using a 5500Watt heating element at 100%, I'm inputting about 312 BTU/min...Using this site and the table for the losses due to evaporation and radiation...- FNMwacki
- Thread
- Boiling Heat Water
- Replies: 12
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
Ya, thanks for the input, but i already know the expectation should not exist... Or you could see Wiki as Mark pointed out...- FNMwacki
- Post #14
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
Ok, thanks again for the help. Looking back now I probably could have been more clear what I was doing in the original post...- FNMwacki
- Post #11
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
You are correct, f(x; 0, 1) = 1/(pi * (1 + x^2)) is my PDF, but i am trying to prove the Expectation of this pdf, so ∫ x*f(x)dx from -∞ to ∞ I pull out the 1/pi, use U substitution for (1+x^2), so i have (1/pi)*∫ x/(2xu) du, where du=2xdx => dx=du/2x then i call pull out the 2 from the...- FNMwacki
- Post #9
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
Thanks again for the response, but I'm not sure I follow the point you are trying to make here... If the integrals diverge, and knowing Cauchy Distribution is symmetric, we can use the reflection property and also say it is 2*(infinity - 0)...- FNMwacki
- Post #7
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
PS - Thanks for the "Helpful symbols" ;)- FNMwacki
- Post #5
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
Thanks for the response, I see your point, but even evaluating as such I would get (∞ -0) + (0 - ∞) = (∞ - ∞) which is still undefined...- FNMwacki
- Post #4
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
Is it sufficient to state that both these limits (at positive and Neg infinity) = infinity and that (infinity - infinity) is not defined??- FNMwacki
- Post #2
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution
I've evaluated the integral of my problem to be (ln(x^2 + 1)/2*pi), and need to evaluate this at infinity and negative infinity...not sure where to proceed from here to evaluate these limits. Actually i need to prove that it doesn't exist (I am proving the first moment of the Cauchy...- FNMwacki
- Thread
- Integral Limit
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help