Fra's latest activity
-
Fra reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Like.
The unistochastic formalism won't yield a fundamental ontology in the sense that we do not have a fundamental quantum theory of the... -
Fra replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Yes, but in the vision i tried to paint, signalling between "map encoders" is exactly what is required to revise the "map". Causation...
-
Fra reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Haha.
Just in some branches. -
Fra replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.The problem here is we are iteration interpretations as we are interpreting Baranders possible interpretations, that said I take a...
-
Fra reacted to jbergman's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with Like.
Yes. From the interview he still says he doesn't have much intuition for the theory or have a fundamental ontology. At this point it's...
-
Fra replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….Both these views, wilsonian RG flow between effective theories and the idea that qm structures is distinguished in theory space are good...
-
Fra reacted to bhobba's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
Renormalisation was once seen as mathematical trickery, but several physicists, such as Wilson and Weinberg, clarified what was...
-
Fra replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Without knowing in depth what Barandes has up his sleeves, as I see it, his correspodence at least provides a valuable handle on in what...
-
Fra reacted to jbergman's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with Like.
Thought this might be of interest for those following Barandes nee interpretation. Carroll always has pretty good interviews...
-
Fra replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….I agree there is always something one can call intuition, just like in an inference system there are "implicit prior information" that...
-
Fra replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….I can't speak for others, but when I worry about "foundations of QM" it does not refers to non relativistic models of the atom, it...
-
Fra replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.I can elaborate later but as i see everything from and inference perspective, i view bohrs reference to classical background as a...
-
Fra replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.I know they had different perspectives, but what I consider CI today, is what seems to be the conceptual conjuction of their views; once...
-
Fra replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….In the perspective of evolution of law, an answer was proposed here by Smolin "The view I will propose answers Wigner’s query about the...
-
Fra reacted to iste's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
I don't find that a mystery at all to be honest; to me, its like asking about the unreasonable effectiveness of language in describing...