Fra's latest activity

I'll try to avoid missing words in this post. But it's nevertheless not trivial to explain, but comment again, using the logic of...

Remember that the underlying ontology here is the system's classical configuration, and so variables represented by a diagonal matrix in...

For me, checking your texts for omitted words and unnecessary typos before posting would be enough.

My wife tells me the same, so its not just about physics 🤣 Im aware of this sorry. I should spend more time editing and explaining...

Fra‘s frequent typos, word omissions, and grammar mistakes contribute a lot to making his posts hard to decipher: Fra may believe...

This easily sounds a conceptually confusing I think. As I choose to view this, I think it makes no sense to speak about the...

I just thought that the two distributions nicely illustrate that without further clarification, it remains ambiguous whether there is an...

My personal opinion on this, is it seems to me most conceptually consistent view is that the actual "configuration" which consists of a...

Good question, and I think this ia very often true! Taking the empirical content - in context - serious is what lead me to the...

The Ad hoc reasoning we have all seen? Sure. But it is elegant and something to strive for? And even if an ad hoc model can later be...

I think there shouldnt be. The idea that there even can come to exist rational description of something, without having interact with...

@iste What Barandes presents is a correspondence between quantum theories, and theories of unistochastic processes. This seems quite...

The unistochastic formalism won't yield a fundamental ontology in the sense that we do not have a fundamental quantum theory of the...