Recent content by Fra

Conceptually I think of it so that, when a "fundamental theory" is indistiniguishable from an "effective one" is a contextual question itself and and this is a statement about the capacity of when the physical context itself interactionwise decouples from the details. This itself then also...

I agree you did a great job on that mission! I Agree with all this. This is why by "observers" i dont mean observer as per qm, because they are fiction. I mean a generalized notion of "observers" of which the quantum observer is a limiting case only. This limiting structure is sufficient for...

What I think is excellent is that I think you succeded in formalising how QM is in fact used and how it relates to the macroscopic information in a conservative sense (ie not modifying it). To formalise HOW information from the whole environment is used to make inferences about the quantum...

Unless that stuff happens to have preservatives added that that inhibits the s.cerevisae I would guess it may work, it would be easy to try in small batch. But you need to gelatinize the starch just as with the flour to give the amylase access to work. You probably need to get this a bigger...

I absolutely got that! But thanks for the nice array ot quotes! I just wrote RUTA's logic to express that I share the distinction of different principles you tried to make. /Fredrik

I can symphatize with RUTA's logic here in that he tries to add several "constraints" he calls principles and see what they imply for the theory. I always views the first postulated of SR as a special case of what I consider the even more general principle that says that the laws of physics...

I read some of your work years ago and there is alot to like about it and from what I recall you did a good job to explain what you set out to do, such as operationally defined current they. Needles too say I symphatize with most of your motivation for coming up with the...

I wonder if anyone ever read a clear and brilliant writing about the conceptual foundations of QM? I don't think I have. /Fredrik

Isnt' the philosophy just that it is impossible to even define a traditional dynamical law in a classical configuration space formed from distinguishable outcomes of definite single observations? This may seem like an empty or trivial philosophy in that it does not attempt try to explain HOW to...

I wonder, are we "using Bohr" to strenghten our own new ideas/interpretations... OR Are we honouring Bohr as one of the founders, by noting that he seems to have kept many doors open that are still beeing examined long time after? Rather than implying this or that, didnt Bohr just try to not...

I'll try to avoid missing words in this post. But it's nevertheless not trivial to explain, but comment again, using the logic of post#70 how I view all this. The question is how to understand the "preferred basis" that is sort of implicit i Baranders picture. But to avoid confusion with...

My wife tells me the same, so its not just about physics 🤣 Im aware of this sorry. I should spend more time editing and explaining properly. /Fredrik

This easily sounds a conceptually confusing I think. As I choose to view this, I think it makes no sense to speak about the configuration/beables as not requiring a mesurement device. I rather think of it all, that the beables are more like a kind of special trivial case of "self measurement"...

My personal opinion on this, is it seems to me most conceptually consistent view is that the actual "configuration" which consists of a number of distinguishable states, which in the generaly case, hardly has form a continuum - does change stochastically step by step. So while we can imagine a...

Good question, and I think this ia very often true! Taking the empirical content - in context - serious is what lead me to the inference perspective and the insight that both the inference process and its context are constrained physically, just like real physics llmit computational power etc...