Recent content by Frankboyle
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
I added the impedance of the capacitor and inductor, is this not the correct method?- Frankboyle
- Post #62
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
I've re-done my calculations using Zth instead of Zc, does this look better?- Frankboyle
- Post #60
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
So as for the calculations, where I've previously used Zc, should I just use Zth to work out In?- Frankboyle
- Post #58
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
So would this be the correct conversion?- Frankboyle
- Post #56
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
Sorry about the delay, only just had a chance to give part C a go! I'm feeling a bit more sure about this part, but I've attached my work anyway just to be sure- Frankboyle
- Post #54
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
If both sources are suppressed then there wouldn't be any current flowing through the resistor, so it shouldn't affect the Thevenin Impedance- Frankboyle
- Post #42
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
For the Thevenin Impedance, do I need to take into account the resistor from the left side of the circuit? Or just the impedance from the capacitor and inductor?- Frankboyle
- Post #40
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
Ah I understand now! Using -10/7 as the capacitor's impedance I got Vo= 2.6257 + j9.7993- Frankboyle
- Post #38
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
I've re-done my working out for Vo considering that 1/j=-j, am I correct?- Frankboyle
- Post #36
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
Here's my working out for the voltage divider- Frankboyle
- Post #31
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
I used the voltage divider equation to get a value of (70/71)*V for Vo. I then multiplied the cartesian form of V (2.5882 + j9.6593) by 70/71, which gave 2.5517 +j 9.5233 Am I mean't to use (Z1*Z2)/(Z1+Z2) to find ZT, rather than just adding them?- Frankboyle
- Post #29
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
So by using the cartesian form of the voltage, I have gotten to the answer of: VT= 2.5517 + j9.5233 As for ZT, I simply added Z1 and Z2 together to get the overall impedance, which was: ZT=0+j101.429- Frankboyle
- Post #27
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
So here is the circuit when you ignore the current source+resistor. What value do I use for V though? Would I use the peak value of 10V?- Frankboyle
- Post #24
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
-
F
Engineering Electrical Engineering - circuits - Reactive Networks
So the voltage produced by the current source and resistor in series doesn't affect the voltage produced by the voltage source- Frankboyle
- Post #22
- Forum: Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help