gentzen's latest activity
-
gentzen reacted to sbrothy's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with
Like.
Well, I’m glad to be of help. However little or indirect it may be. :smile: -
gentzen replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.I changed my mind. I guess I was too much influenced by Henry Stapp, despite disagreeing with him: Bohr's ideas and views should be...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….Thanks, your comment made me notice that the wikipedia article "implicitly proposes" a solution to the whole conundrum surrounding the...
-
gentzen reacted to .Scott's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
@bhobba responding to @PeroK 's: "The question, put in more sober terms, is whether mathematics is sufficient to describe nature at a...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….Not sure what you mean: It could be: If current language(s) would not be good enough for the job, we would keep inventing new language...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.Looks like Lord Jestocost "likes" Heisenberg's variant of Copenhagen: In the "other" thread, Morbert and Fra showed "appreciation" for...
-
gentzen reacted to Nugatory's post in the thread I Validity of identical eigenfunction of commutating operators with Like.
If two operators commute, then at least some of the eigenfunctions of one will be eigenfunctions of the other - but not necessarily all...
-
gentzen reacted to hokhani's post in the thread I Validity of identical eigenfunction of commutating operators with Like.
I got confused about an elementary statement in quantum mechanics: As far as I know, the two commuting operators like ##\hat {\mathbf...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences?.Maybe "one of the few elaborated accounts of Bohr's variant of the Copenhagen interpretion" would be a better description. Which is...
-
gentzen reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread A How Does MWI explain Type I PDC Photon Polarization Entanglement? with Like.
I think that's the source of your confusion. The branches don't "interact" (or more precisely, don't interfere) with each other when...
-
gentzen reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
You don't understand that associating a quantum state with a particle is not the same as measuring it. 1. It's false that what you say...
-
gentzen reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
A and B are entangled, and hence in an inseperable state, so a projective measurement on A projects the entire system onto a new state...
-
gentzen reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
Yes, I'm reading you. Thanks for your answer :smile: Now, I understand your objection much better. Let me address this with a simple...
-
gentzen reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
"For successive, non-destructive projective measurements with discrete results, each measurement with measuring value can be regarded as...
-
gentzen reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
As I said in post #90, if what you're saying is that you don't like an interpretation that assumes that a measurement on particle 1...
