gentzen's latest activity

One way to look at it is that a massless field does not have any built-in scale of energy or length; waves of the field of all possible...

I went back to this now, and studied in detail what Barandes said in what you quoted, and also in the transcript around that passage...

But what does it actually mean? The Thing-in-itself is unknowable. Only representation and observation are knowable. (I took those two...

I'm not convinced that "relativity of simultaneity" is based on much stronger grounds. Maybe the microwave background defines a...

You quoted: I mean the property of QM first emphasized by Everett, to which Bohmians will point, if Arnold Neumaier or Robert Helling...

You are correct, there is a counterintuitive consequence of the observer-independence of h corresponding to the relativity of...

In Everett's thesis, he analyses the predictions of QM based on the information available to the agent which tries to verify them. In...

If they were exactly analogous, you should also be able to spell out what corresponds to "relativity of simultaneity" in the case of QM...

The red Insights tag in the thread title is gone now.

I didn't buy the book, I read the copy from a public library. I don't remember whether I noticed that actually Leighton was the author...

How can you trust Ralph that the quotes are directly from Feynman, given he is so dishonest when it comes to the actual author of the...

See here for what this difference implies: My toy model itself was:

Or maybe, rather don't read it. This book was not written by Richard Feynman, but by Ralph Leighton. This is hinted at by "Adventures of...

No. That's not how the MWI works. In the MWI, all possible outcomes occur, each in its own branch of the wave function. It's not even...

It seems to me that what changes is the rate of change of the phase, not the phase itself. I guess the most direct interpretation of...