Recent content by Gordon Jump

  1. G

    A Significance of "Change of Signature" in Classical Relativity

    OK - I think I have an answer. Tell me what you think. I have two metrics that I can define: dx^2+dy^2 and dx^2 + sin^2( x) dy^2. These are intrinsically different in some way in that I don't think there is a coordinate transformation that can take one to the other.
  2. G

    A Significance of "Change of Signature" in Classical Relativity

    https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/011/meta
  3. G

    A Significance of "Change of Signature" in Classical Relativity

    You are agreeing with me. We choose the Lorentzian metric because it is physically interesting, but we could equally well choose the Euclidean metric - it just wouldn't be as interesting. My actual question is "What is the significance of a change of signature in general relativity"
  4. G

    A Significance of "Change of Signature" in Classical Relativity

    Yes, and after I measure the coordinates of an object, I am free to enter those numbers into any metric function I choose.
  5. G

    A Significance of "Change of Signature" in Classical Relativity

    Thank you, but I don't think this is the correct answer. I measure coordinates, and their infinitesimal changes. I am free to plug those coordinates into any scalar function I choose.
  6. G

    A Significance of "Change of Signature" in Classical Relativity

    I'm a bit confused about the idea of "Change of Signature in Classical Relativity". As I see it, a metric is just a scalar function that I make up. For example, in the x,y plane I can define the functions x^2+y^2 and x^2-y^2 simultaneously. What, then, is the significance of "changing" the...
Back
Top