Recent content by indierail

The failure mode of the smaller is burnt windings; not a failure we have seen or are seeing with the older-style then or now. I am still baffled about the fact that the mechanical-driven portion of the device can be exactly the same for both, have exactly the same flow-rate, max pressure...

They import the motors and as part of an assembly. My transaction took place in the U.S. There are several reasons - it's not just a "motor" it's a motor they apply to something and sell to me; I then apply it in a system. There are many, many of this style in service today as both the old...

They are sole manufacturer of a unique style and purchased all competition previously making similar product. In any case we have reverted to purchasing the original motor. I am trying to examine things as they are in reference to the Uniform Commercial Code and how that may relate to the...

Thank you for the response; yes I am having trouble with a motor supplied to my company that hasn't performed well. I'm hesitant to go into too many specific details regarding the players but am planning on having the motor Dyno tested. I mentioned shaft diameter as a function to illustrate...

So how come one lasts longer than the other or maybe I should say how does one verify the ratings?

So how are they rated? If that is they case why waste all that copper on windings if it can achieve the same thing with less materials?

When I say they perform the same work they have identical mechanical outputs in flow rate for air, maximum pressure achieved and the mechanical devices they are attached to are identical in terms of all aspects with the exception of the flange mount. This is due to the described size difference...

I'm not sure where to post this one but i'll start with the mechanical guys first. There are two different motors that share identical ratings but different sizes physically. They are represented as though they perform the same work, share a common HP and KW rating and the mechanical device...