Recent content by Infomeantion

---------------------------------------------------------------- That does not make it true or untrue compared to context, simply developed or undeveloped as it were. (this is what I have taken this to mean) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This quote is...

Canute: I did read a large portion of the link you gave, and I thank you for your interest and enthusiasm of the posts here. Do you have any thoughts on specifics in the posts? Darkwing: I already replied once...but Physics Forum had timed out on me and I lost the whole thing. I...

First off, I would say that this kind of test doesn't really have 'correct' answers, but there are relationships among the words that are more peculiar or singular when compared to others. I am glad Semper000 posted his responses and am just posting some thoughts I have regarding the...

f) aging, frump, steam, spied, valet h) heritage, panorama, palisade, channels, paranoid, morosely, lemonade f) spied - the other words have drinks in as the middle three letters, e.g. aGINg, fRUMp, whereas spied has a food. h) paranoid - the other words have names in the middle, e.g...

Allow me to try to rephrase how I initially read this thread's first post, which is essentially one argument nested within another. One, which I'll call 'Argument A', is the internal consistency of your reasoning with P1, P2, P3 and C. You show plainly that the argument is self-contradicty...

---------------------------------------------------------------- AFAIK, (if you mean absolute proof as opposed to 'beyond reasonable doubt) there is no proof that proof exists there is no evidence that proof exists there is evidence that proof does not exist (but not proof), 'Proof' is a...

-------------------------------------------------------- Here we go: P1: I did not exist in 1776. P2: I exist now in a reality that includes P1 as being true. P3: I go back in time (using whatever means) to 1776. C: I did exist in 1776! ...

Original question which is the odd word out and why? a) gun, boy, pay, rob, sin, new b)mail, dine, annoy, asset, sinned c) ethereal, withered, furthest, brethen, untether, d) defamation, deputation, persuasion, mendacious, numeration, precarious, e) wind, srow, elope, tear f) aging...

I have enjoyed reading these posts the past few days, but I wonder how similar a thread entitled "Whats the proof that proof exists?" would grow. Perhaps we could start one and see, hmm?

I'm glad that you have read my posts, and although I hope that you intend the meaning of 'understand' to be in the progressive tense. But let's get to the decimal issue: --------------------------------------------------------------- This decimal thing though... (Saying you can go into...

---------------------------------------------------------------- So it exists or does not exist, it cannot half exist as a being, no matter how many t/f relations with in it. ---------------------------------------------------------------- I think I now understand partly what you are trying...

I will try to respond, although I am not sure exactly what meaning you are trying to communicate. We are using language, and in most language I see a lot of what I call fluff, or high-level obfuscation. If you have ever tried programming, then hopefully you understand how much information goes...

I don't understand how you can ask for proof of something existing or not before you define the terms, but then again I don't understand much.

-------------------------------------------------------------------- in the language of logic, "this statement is false" is not in the language. actually, it may be the case that "this statement is false" can be translated into a well formed formula but i haven't heard of that...

I've never posted on here, or anywhere else for that matter, so bear with me per favore. (Disclaimer) I am somewhat discontent with words and our current understanding of how information flows, so I oftentimes use quotes around words because of that unreliability of what is sometimes...