Recent content by IsItSo

I didn't think my reply was rude... I'm sorry. I am pretty lost, now. Aren't the radio-photons big? As big as a city? At least I mean, something about them is, from what I read before.

Are you saying that the photon is a point-like-particle, while it caries a wave ball? Like a massive city-sized glass ball with a hard dark point-particle in its center? Or that the point-like-particle is moving uppp and downnnn repeat in a big radio wave as wide as a city? How does that cover...

I don't think that makes total sense...try again... Also if radio is so big that how is that point-like-particles?

Aren't photons dual-theory i.e. wave-like particle-like?

No what I meant is, when you say "this photon X" is a trillionth of a meter or 1 picometer, saying such is suggesting the photon is that small, i.e. that-much-of-a-meter, because either way you say it is 1 trillionth of a meter or that it's 1 picometer - a trillionth of a meter. The photon must...

Yes, you can say either it's 1 trillionth of a meter or 1 picometer, BUT, in either scenario, it's still saying that the photon is 1-trillionth of a meter! Why say this! It has to be 1 trillionth of a meter.

Ok...but...why use meters then....the wiki page says a picometer is 1 trillionth of a meter.

How do they calculate a photons wavelength? I know what yous say all the time, but, isn't the full proof way to calculate this by seeing if it goes through a hole to determine its size? Determining its energy is one thing, but talking about "wavelength" only makes sense to me if they know how...

But am I supposed to times 10-20 by 1.24? Why don't they just give the answer/number? It's not a solid number, ex. 5, it's an equation ex. 5 x 99.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-energy_gamma_ray Wikipedia says this about Very-High-Energy Gamma Rays: This is approximately equal to wavelengths between 1.24 × 10−17 and 1.24 × 10−20 meters, or frequencies of 2.42 × 1025 to 2.42 × 1028 Hz. Such energy levels have been detected from...

I understand the precision. I'm putting the precision on the shoulders of a future super-artificial-intelligence. So as you said at the end, if their velocities when let go were not so big then they would not go diagonal and rather be on the same height level and would work?

So you're saying the far flywheel on the other side of Earth, when hit by the precisely timed parcels, will go into higher orbit?? I don't get it, you have two flywheels on opposite sides of Earth, with the same orbital height all perfectly, and one flywheel is spinning fast with two loads...

It's supposed to achieve a whole bunch of flywheels (and technological-structure) staying in space - in a geo-stationary orbit, with the flywheels holding the stored energy for a long time, and so, when the constructors want to transport matter, they can *quickly and *efficiently transport...

I'm confused, is the whole idea plausible?

Because they're in space?...Won't they basically indefinitely keep spinning?