iste's latest activity
-
iste replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….I don't find that a mystery at all to be honest; to me, its like asking about the unreasonable effectiveness of language in describing... -
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.But a unistochastic process could feasibly be an effective description for any kind of underlying system you want. The unistochastic...
-
iste replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I no longer consider this an interpretation of QM, I think. The stochastic process includes the measurement device and only tells you...
-
iste reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with
Like.
This illustrates an issue that is common in this subforum: there is no way to resolve disputes about interpretations. The experimental... -
iste reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
There is a certain confusion between the prediction of the experimental results and its interpretation in terms of entanglement...
-
And in post-modern understanding of QM, it's considered to be a reductio ad absurdum showing that objective facts don't exist. 🙃
-
iste reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread A Challenge to Bohmian mechanics by Sharoglazova et al, Nature, 2025 with Like.
Here it is: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08049