Recent content by ivars

  1. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Radiation Up To 4 Times Higher Than Chernobyl Evac Zone Found In Soil 30 km Away From Fukushima; Rice Harvest In Question http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201104080169.html
  2. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    There is a bigger aftershock still due. This 6.6. was pretrigerred, got of too early, hence it was small, hence so much energy still unsettled ( many aftershocks) . Since it got triggered before its time, the bigger energy it was supposed to release is still in the fault. I expect one more...
  3. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Many nuclear facilities have lost onsite or off-site power. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html" Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant: NISA has confirmed that two out of the three lines supplying off-site power to the site were lost following the 7 April earthquake. Off-site...
  4. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    I predicted such larger late aftershocks may come here, on March 27th: http://saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=1245&start=1040#p31381" And this may be not the last, but first, and not the biggest one.
  5. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    TEPCO does not know where the contaminated water comes from: http://www.saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2657&p=31585#p31585" Tokyo Electric Power Co. used colored powder Monday to trace the source of highly radioactive water leaking into the sea near the troubled Fukushima...
  6. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Leak continues into the Pacific after polymer-paper-sawdust application: http://saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2657&p=31565#p31565"
  7. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Worst case scenario for this accident spelled out in Real News: http://saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2657&p=31564#p31564" Could nor resist to listen. So, if something of this does not happen, we should be happy.
  8. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    https://www.physicsforums.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=3225300" Tokyo Electric Power Co. took steps to encase the fracture in concrete as an emergency measure but the utility said later that the amount of leakage was unchanged even after the measure was taken. The utility...
  9. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    http://www.lex18.com/news/un-high-radiation-outside-japan-s-exclusion-zone" Elena Buglova, an official from the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the reading was 2 megabecquerels per square meter at the village of Iitate, adding that "as a ratio it was about two times higher" than...
  10. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/30/us-japan-nuclear-iaea-idUSTRE72T5JR20110330" (Reuters) - Radiation measured at a village 40 km from Japan's crippled nuclear plant exceeded a criterion for evacuation, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Wednesday, the latest sign of widening...
  11. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    http://www.fairewinds.com/content/what-we-do" Opnion of update on Fukushima by a Nuclear scientist. From the site-how water may have leaked outside containment, into trenches: http://fairewinds.com/sites/default/files/bwr-crd5.jpg
  12. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    http://saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2657&p=31438#p31438"
  13. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    http://saposjoint.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=2657&p=31435#p31435"
  14. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/28/uk-nuclear-japan-massachusetts-idUSLNE72R01I20110328"
  15. I

    Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

    Tepco's new numbers does not include neither I-134 nor Co-56. However, every isotope below I-131 has increased in activity by 30-50% in last 12 hours.
Back
Top