javisot's latest activity
-
Jjavisot reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with
Like.
Fine, but you can think of toss as internal environment. (For the notion of internal environment in QM see e.g. my... -
Jjavisot reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
This is simply wrong. A probe of a pure, weakly radioactive, crystalline substance consists in the traditional models of a huge number...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.If we want to explain the entire set of experimental data that make up QM and we try to do so by violating UP, the result is a...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
Yes, but my point was that if you don't know or control the details of the environment, then the probability remains 1/2. And this...
-
JNot in this case. The curvature parameter ##\Omega_{\kappa}=0.0007 ± 0.0019##, meaning its zero value is WITHIN the margin of error...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread B Could we ever create a black hole?.Another example: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/9/4/162
-
Jjavisot reacted to Greg Bernhardt's post in the thread B Could we ever create a black hole? with Like.
The closest we've gotten? https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043084
-
JSo you want a handy 1 kg black hole to pass around the classroom ? It will be smaller than a normal proton, how will you hold it ? How...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread B Could we ever create a black hole?.No law of physics prevents it, but it's highly unlikely, and it certainly wouldn't be easy. If by "creating a black hole" you mean...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.But that's only true before the coin is tossed, right? Before tossing an unbiased coin the probability is 1/2. When we toss it, that...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
CM+ includes contextuality/measurement incompatibility, which allows multiple experiments to be modeled in a single algebraic structure...
-
Jjavisot reacted to phinds's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
QM is KNOWN to be incomplete, although not regarding entanglement (I make no argument either way on that) but rather because it cannot...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.Very interesting. One question: Are there differences between CM and CM+, or does CM+ simply represent the idea that CM is complete? Is...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
The idea that QM is incomplete whereas, presumably, CM is complete, has colored the foundations of physics for too long. I suggest that...
-
Jjavisot reacted to syed's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
I keep reading throughout this forum from many members that the general motivation for finding a deeper explanation within QM...