Recent content by jcyoon

Dear Colleagues, Recently I have posted a calculational proof substantiating my claim regarding the SLAC E158 asymmetry in http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/0811.3700, since I think one of the reasons that this issue has not been clearly resolved is that no elaborated details of the parity violation...

Dear Hans de Vries, Thanks for an interesting anology of wall. Though I am not fond of anology, let me try this time. Helicity is defined by whether spin direction is parallel or antiparallel to momentum. For the example of wall, we can observe the Left-handed helicity drill as...

Dear Hans de Vries, Thanks for your kind and elaborate comments. First, L or R from \psi_{L,R} denotes chirality, not helicity mentioned in 3) Helicity. In the Standard Model, the definition of Left-handed field \psi_{L} is given by \psi_{L} \equiv (1 - \gamma^{5})\psi which...

Dear Kay zum Felde, Thanks for your kind comment. I agree with you that Professor Weinberg's reply itself was regarding neutrino, which was quite accurate. As you may have already read my response to his, I have suggested to put aside the nuetrino issue, since the issue I have raised is...

Dear Kay zum Felde, Thanks for your interest in my paper. The Hamiltonian H_{weak} in my paper is consist of massive fermion fields($\psi$), whereas the electroweak theory in S. Weinberg: "Quantum Theory of Fields II, page 305 is based on massless fermion, though it is rather ambiguous...

Dear CarlB, I would like to appreciate your kind attention and comments. The paper you mentioned "The Origin of CP Violation" is meant to be brief and supported by other following papers. That is why you may find some statements rather obscure. What I tried to point out is that the...

Recently I have posted a preprint on the web (http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0502142) that contradicts the conclusion of the unification of electroweak interactions, which is the very reason the Standard Model is awarded Nobel prize. Before putting this preprint, I have asked as many...