Recent content by jnhrtmn

I do have concrete proof that math can perfectly describe what you see AND totally hide the actual cause of the effect, but it will probably get deleted from this site, because this site is NOT for new things, so this discussion may be ruined by this. My youtube channel is jnhrtmn, and the...

Math comes with rules that help it stay in a lane. I think it could be a useful tool to help, but it is mistreated by using it exclusively. Modern science does not even have the language to explain "why" nature does whatever it does. I came away from physics with years of headaches, because...

Back to Doppler, it seems overcomplicated. Using 0.6c added to c gives 1.6c, (contracted length) / (speed multiplier), 0.8/1.6=0.5. The other is 0.8/0.4=2 This works throughout. Is it because1.6c can't be real, but even sqrt 1.6 is still 1.265. Using 1 instead of contracted length is the...

Clocks are always some form of oscillator. Math is using time as a sequence marker to describe the oscillation or periodic effect. Send a pendulum into space and the clock stops measuring what it was measuring. Remember and anticipate are in the brain. How can I see time as more than numbers...

I appreciate this greatly. I have to work some things out myself. Everything here deals with the consequences of light-constant-per-observer with time being a real physical thing and not just in your head as a function of thought. If time exists, I can see it. Thanks

Use 0.6c for simple numbers. Length cont. is 0.8x, time dilation is 1.25x, Doppler shifts are 0.5x and 2x. To me, these are not mechanisms, which is what I'm looking for in it, a mechanism. I can't relate the frequency change with the other changes yet, still looking at it. I would almost...

You are using the same wave train for two different observers here, each seeing c. I will have to come back with some accounting.

The straight lined path of the square sets your inertial frame. When you turn left, new leg, new frame compared to the frame of the Universe. You see light at c, so new path, same c, my question was about the entire beam of light traveling to you. It travels to you, arrives at c only, and...

So, you just think the light is entering your eyes at one speed as a matter of opinion, and the rest of the light beam didn't actually change to get to you in the condition that it's in?

If you and your frame are following a square path in space, and the Universe is the other frame, each leg of the square path instantly changes every photon in the Universe to suit your dimensional perspective of speed, length, frequency, and time. Is this new light situation actually different...

There is nothing gyroscopic about this video. It is purely inertial acceleration or deceleration about an axis in order to manage that axis. The other wheel is not even needed. The device will react opposite to the wheel acceleration or deceleration (reverse acceleration).