Recent content by Line_112

I publish my work on my online channels [redacted by mentors] The advantage of this type of publication is that articles can be edited and expanded upon as new ideas arise and new information becomes available. If I consider them justified, then why not?

In any case, a deficit of weak bursts also occurs with an intragalactic origin. The combination of an intragalactic origin and the presence of a high redshift clearly indicates their artificial nature, as natural intragalactic objects cannot move so quickly, while artificial ones can be...

Galaxies can appear and die. But overall, what we call the Universe must be much older than 13 billion years, since otherwise many things don't add up. According to steady-state hypotheses, the beginning, if it happened, was very long ago, meaning galaxies existed even before 13-14 billion years...

Even ignoring the Milky Way's disk, the map doesn't have a very isotropic distribution. I've already learned intuitively to recognize where random statistics hold and where they don't. The gamma-ray burst map features vast regions with clearly elevated and depressed concentrations of markers...

The lack of weak bursts in the overall statistics is easily explained by the fact that, given a constant gamma-ray burst power, most of them will occur within the galaxies disk, that is, not very far from us. Further away, in the halo, the density of stars drops sharply, so few bursts will...

But the weakest flares no longer pass through the scattering medium of the galactic disk. Therefore, their number at the equator should be smaller, meaning anisotropy in the distribution across the celestial sphere should result. For example, we would see the Sun through thin clouds, but not the...

But then it would have been written differently, for example: In the galactic disk, the afterglow of gamma-ray bursts is very difficult to detect because... Or: In the galactic disk, host galaxies are very difficult to detect because... As I read today, gamma radiation is scattered by the...

I previously created a thread here regarding the map of the gamma-ray burst distribution on the celestial sphere, taken from the English Wikipedia article on gamma-ray bursts. It suggests that it is approximately uniform, although not entirely so, as there is still variation in the concentration...

I am not against continuing the research of extraterrestrial signals. I am against using increasingly powerful telescopes for this. That is, so that the detection radius does not increase.

I focused on another aspect. That even if the telescope's sensitivity is the same as that of a ground-based one, there will be less risk of getting erroneous results - mistaking anthropogenic radio emission for alien and vice versa. It seems quite probable to me that many alien signals could be...

Rather, to increasing the power of telescopes than to change their location. On Earth, is greatly hampered by terrestrial interference, and it is always very unpleasant when a suspicious signal is first reported, and then official scientists refute it. A telescope on the far side of the Moon...

I read that there are ideas to build a radio telescope on the far side of the Moon. There will be no anthropogenic noise there.

Fast radio bursts, for example.

It seems to me that this will be too expensive and will require a lot of resources, and possibly territories.

It will be more gradual and less clear-cut, and will take many decades. By that time, the climate change and nuclear threat may already be solved, and therefore it will not be so scary to get negative results (although I hope they will be positive). And if they are not solved, then civilization...