Recent content by m0gh

  1. M

    Integration with Partial Fraction Decomposition

    After talking with the old teacher/friend I am here: -2x + 4 = (A+B+D)x^{3} + (-A +C - 2D + E)x^{2} + (A + B + D -2E)x -A + C + E Still working towards the answer. Please let me know if you see any mistakes
  2. M

    Integration with Partial Fraction Decomposition

    Just talked to an old teacher/friend and she said it should be set up as A/x-1 + (Bx+C)/(x-1)^(2) + (Cx + D)/(x^(2) + 1) so I'm not sure what you mean, Steam King
  3. M

    Integration with Partial Fraction Decomposition

    Homework Statement \int \frac{-2x + 4}{(x-1)^{(2)}(x^{(2)}+1)}Homework Equations The Attempt at a Solution I've done the problem a couple times but the answers keep coming out differently so I'm assuming I am messing up the setup. This is what I have for the first part of the setup: -2x +...
  4. M

    Surface area problem involving solids of revolution

    Okay, now I understand this problem and what I learned here has spilled over into other integration problems. I want to ask though. When you integrate along the x-axis are the rings still in the same position as integrating along the y-axis? When I think about integrating along x my mind...
  5. M

    Surface area problem involving solids of revolution

    I can definitely see the bigger picture now. The $$dl=\sqrt{dr^2 + (y(r+dr)-y(r))^2}\\$$ is the length of the line between (x, f(x)) and (x+dx, f(x+dx) from the Pythagorean theorem. Then using that as the "height" or "width" of the truncated cone and multiplying it by 2##\pi##r then...
  6. M

    Surface area problem involving solids of revolution

    I really appreciate your help with this, Simon. When you say: When you say the annulus between y and y+dy I am imagining the small change in the y is accounting for the very small height of the rectangle or rings. This height multiplied by length (2\pir) accounts for the surface area of...
  7. M

    Surface area problem involving solids of revolution

    Thanks everyone for your help with this one. I talked with my professor last night and her first question was why I set it up as x = \sqrt{9-y} She told me to try it again the way it is already set up. Honestly I did it the first way because it was my intuition and I didn't question it...
  8. M

    Surface area problem involving solids of revolution

    Can anyone spot a/the mistake?
  9. M

    Work required to pump tank full of kerosene

    I'm really sorry. I just forgot to multiply the pi and that's why I thought it was wrong. Thank you, Tanya. You have been very helpful and patient. I really enjoy when I ask for help and someone actually helps me to understand instead of just spitting out the answer.
  10. M

    Work required to pump tank full of kerosene

    Even using the (30-y) yields the same result after integrating. I think I'm more confused now than I was before.
  11. M

    Work required to pump tank full of kerosene

    Thank you so much. I took the integral from [0,30] of ∫51.2*100*pi*y*dy which gave: 5120∏[(y^2)/2] from [0,30] 5120∏[450-0] = 2,304,000∏ I hope this is correct I feel a lot better about these problems if so. EDIT: This answer is not correct. I just searched for this problem online...
  12. M

    Work required to pump tank full of kerosene

    Oh I think I see. If it is displaced y units then it should be weight*y ?
  13. M

    Work required to pump tank full of kerosene

    I'm sorry the wording of these problem types always gets me confused. So if the weight W = 100∏p*r^2*dy Then the work is determined by the integral of the weight from 0 to y?
  14. M

    Work required to pump tank full of kerosene

    If the volume of one disc is 100∏dy then I'm guessing (30-y)*100p∏dy would equal the weight?
  15. M

    Work required to pump tank full of kerosene

    If you mean a cross section that creates a circular disc then the Volume would be V = ∏(r2)dy Substitute 10 for r which gives V=∏ 100 dy?
Back
Top