Recent content by Markov2
-
M
MHB Solving First-Order PDE: $u_x+2u_y+2u=0$
Solve $u_x+2u_y+2u=0,$ $x,y\in\mathbb R$ where $u(x,y)=F(x,y)$ in the curve $y=x.$ I don't know what does mean with the $y=x.$ Well I set up the following $\dfrac{dx}{1}=\dfrac{dy}{2}=\dfrac{du}{-2} ,$ is that correct? but I don't know what's next. Thanks for the help!- Markov2
- Thread
- First order Pde
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Fourier series, pointwise convergence, series computation
Let $f(x)=-x$ for $-l\le x\le l$ and $f(l)=l.$ a) Study the pointwise convergence of the Fourier series for $f.$ b) Compute the series $\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)}.$ c) Does the Fourier series of $f$ converge uniformly on $\mathbb R$ ? ------------- First I need to...- Markov2
- Thread
- Computation Convergence Fourier Fourier series Series
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
M
MHB Proving Uniqueness of Fourier Coefficients for Continuous Periodic Functions
Let $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ be a continuous function of period $2\pi.$ Prove that if $\displaystyle\int_0^{2\pi}f(x)\cos(nx)\,dx=0$ for $n=0,1,\ldots$ and $\displaystyle\int_0^{2\pi}f(x)\sin(nx)\,dx=0$ for $n=1,2,\ldots,$ then $f(x)=0$ for all $x\in\mathbb R.$ I know this has to do with the...- Markov2
- Thread
- Coefficients Continuous Fourier Fourier coefficients Functions Periodic Periodic functions Uniqueness
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
M
MHB Solving PDE by using Laplace Transform
Oh yes, that now makes sense!- Markov2
- Post #7
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solve 1st Order PDE: $u_y+f(u)u_x=0$
Sorry for the delay of the reply, but those books are online? Can you give the links if so? Thanks!- Markov2
- Post #12
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Fourier transform to solve the wave equation
I need to use the Fourier transform to solve the wave equation: $\begin{aligned} & {{u}_{tt}}={{c}^{2}}{{u}_{xx}},\text{ }x\in \mathbb{R},\text{ }t>0, \\ & u(x,0)=f(x), \\ & {{u}_{t}}(x,0)=g(x). \end{aligned} $ So I have $\dfrac{{{\partial }^{2}}F(u)}{\partial...- Markov2
- Thread
- Fourier Fourier transform Transform Wave Wave equation
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solving PDE by using Laplace Transform
If I use $u(x,s)$ at $s=0,$ then (2) will give me problems with the third term. :(- Markov2
- Post #5
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solving PDE by using Laplace Transform
Okay but, do I need to find the inverse now for (2) and that's all?- Markov2
- Post #3
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solving PDE by using Laplace Transform
Given $\begin{aligned} & {{u}_{t}}={{u}_{xx}},\text{ }x>0,\text{ }t>0 \\ & u(x,0)={{u}_{0}}, \\ & {{u}_{x}}(0,t)=u(0,t). \end{aligned} $ I need to apply the Laplace transform to solve it. I'll denote $u(x,s)=\mathcal L(u(x,\cdot))(s),$ so for the first line I have $s\cdot...- Markov2
- Thread
- Laplace Laplace transform Pde Transform
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Wave equation and weird notation
Okay I get that, since I have $u(x,t)=\dfrac12\displaystyle\int_{x-c}^{x+c}g(s)\,ds,$ so the solution equals $u(x,t)=\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\int_{x-t}^{x+t}{\left( H(s+1)-H(s-1) \right)\,ds},$ is that what you mean?- Markov2
- Post #8
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Wave equation and weird notation
I still don't get it very well, how to do it with $H(x+1)$ for example? Thanks a lot!- Markov2
- Post #6
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solve Heat Equation with Initial Conditions
Jester, we can actually use the direct results by using separation of variables. I know the solution is a series where the coefficients must be found, but I actually want to know is if I need to pick my $f$ on one interval and then pick it from the other interval, which means that I'd have to...- Markov2
- Post #7
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solving PDE by using another function
I managed to get it. I was drowning myself on a glass of water, I hadn't checked my notes. Thanks for the help anyway!- Markov2
- Post #6
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solving PDE by using another function
Okay, it looks a bit messy from there. I homogenized first the equation, so I let $v(x,t)=u(x,t)+\dfrac{A{{e}^{-x}}}{{{c}^{2}}}$ so that $u(x,t)=v(x,t)-\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}$ then $u_{tt}=v_{tt}$ and $u_x=v_x+\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}$ and $u_{xx}=v_{xx}-\dfrac A{c^2}e^{-x}$ so replacing this to the ODE...- Markov2
- Post #5
- Forum: Differential Equations
-
M
MHB Solving the D'Lembert Method with Multiple Conditions
Thank you Jester! I'm sorry but I'm a bit lost on how applying D'lembert's formula, do I need to apply it for $H(x-1)$ and $H(x-2)$ ? How to do so? Much appreciated!- Markov2
- Post #3
- Forum: Differential Equations