Recent content by mcjosep

So could you say I am gravitationally attracted to something in a different time than right now and calculate that attraction by using this conversion formula and saying that length is the my radius to that object?

Could you use the formula "planck length/c=planck time" to convert time into a spatial distance? Using that to tell how far something is through time.

Thats interesting that they do not work together yet the critical escape velocity formula works using the same logic from that derivative of x=y^2

well you can make C a "variable" when the changing number still represents c. Its just a different way of looking at the formula. and per your "cannot since you already set v to 1 and v<c" comment. I actually took v out of the question and replaced it with % of c. You cannot have gravitational...

I was recently exploring time dilation from Gravity and from velocity and I came up with an interesting derivation that I have not seen before. I was wondering if there is a paper published showing these relationships like this before and where I could find it? First you start with the...

I suppose, it just seems there should be a better way to do it. To have honest peer reviews is a valuable thing. Per ZapperZ's comment though, I feel like a published article could slip into oblivion just as easily.

If a person is in no need to publish anything for a career or to get their PHD then what is the benefit to publishing work vs just posting it on the internet if all you are trying to do is spread a theory/concept?

Just wondering if you are observing someone from a far out distance and they are in a gravitational field going at a high speed would the time dilation from their speed add on to the gravitational time dilation?

I was just making it bold and your part italics to show your part vs my part, I am not to savvy when it comes to make the quote blocks you use. I think I am getting better at it now. I guess in the example where the bike is having a decrease in speed and an increase in flywheel energy I was...

The energy of the attracting mass is just its mass. That doesn't change. The "amount of time that is being dilated" would just be the time dilation formula in terms of the mass (the first formula in your OP). ok I know you know this but I am calculating for E in E/c^2=m I replaced the mass with...

I suppose its modeling the time energy relationship between the energy of the attracting mass and the amount of time that is being dilated. I chose in the formula above to do one second minus x * Planck time and I did this to explore if you were to slow down time by a certain amount then would...

I've been doing some recreational physics and wanted to see if I could come up with a formula for energy/time equivalence. I decided to start with the formula for gravitational time dilation. $$ y=Z\sqrt{1-(2GM/rc^2)} $$ This formula shows what time would look like to an outside observer...

hmm i just figured since Planck time and Planck length are related by a factor of c that they would change the same.

Just to pick an extreme, a 1kg ball is a meter away from the event horizon of a black hole. So, to an outside observer, time is almost not moving at all for the 1 kg ball and its size has shrunk to almost a point due to gravitational length and time dilation but the ball would still be 1 kg?

Hi, Just curious if anyone knows of a formula that would show how mass changes in a gravitational field? I have seen the formulas for gravitational time dilation and length contraction (which are rather similar) and was wondering is mass changes the same way. Thanks