Just been reading the endosymbiotic theory link and I'd like to point out;
"We will never be able to turn back the clocks, thus we will never be absolutely sure of the correct answer."
Thankyou for the links.
In the first though there is constant reference of billion years!
The universe is only 6000MYA not 1*10^12, anyone know why this is?
For the first few questions n=M/m is your equation.
n= # of moles
M= mass in Kg
m= molecular mass (sum of neutrons and protons)
Not to sure about the molecule and particle questions.
I'm pretty sure there is 6.02*10^23 atoms in 1 mole.
2Na^x +(CO3)^2-=Na2CO3
Ok what we know from the equation;
CO3 has a charge of 2-
Two sodium ions are required
The net overall charge of Na2CO3 is 0
Things should be clearer now
What I'm getting at is if that were true wouldn't it prove E=MC^2 wrong?
As the Fe nucleus would have more energy but less mass than the nickel nucleus.
Possibly referring to when electrons are lost negative charge is lost, hence the atom they were lost from gains a positive charge.
I don't know why this would apply to the electrodes though, only the ions.
It does matter.
In a galvanic cell the cathode is positive and the anode is negative.
In an electrolytic cell the cathode is negative and the anode is positive.
So we need to know whether your producing electricity from a cell, e.g. a battery.
Or putting electricity into a cell, e.g...
Yes I know, but if its really that simple why does such a small half-life (in terms of dating fossils) have a +/- 40 years? What kind of discrepenses can we expect for things such as Potassium with a half-life of 1.25billion years?
Now can you explain why we would think the rate of mutation...