Even though I was making a complaint, I knew how the current theory of gravity would describe the fact that we are pulled toward the earth. I accept gravity (like all of you), I just thought centripetal forces were a better explanation. I do not have a problem with gravity.
Also, you did not...
Okay, so if there was a centripetal force on the earth...something would have to create that force. That force might be...gravity...
Alright, here's the deal, guys; just prove to me how gravity pulls us into keep us from flying off Earth and if nessesary; show how it works as a centripetal...
What I am trying is that inertial forces, mostly inerita is what pulls us to the ground.
I made a mistake when I said we would be weightless if the Earth stopped rotating. We would be sent into space because the Earth would produce no more centripetal force to direct everything to the ground...
Even though I have my own thoughts and am tending to stick with my story; I really like and respect your Idea of gravity cuttingedge. It seems like a cool thought. I think it's awesome.
Okay, I was referring to centripetal force, which produces artificial gravity. Let me explain.
Imagine that you are in space, where you are inside a spaceship and you drop a book; it just floats. Now say the spaceship starts rotating. The ship produces a centripetal force, which is a "center...
I am about to give a complaint against gravity; a fundamental law of nature. I have a problem on how it works and how they describe it. I think I have a better way of describing gravity.
Note: This is a attempted complaint against gravity, not a theory. Also, I am not trying to disprove...
What makes an object overcome inertia so that it accelerates in terms of changing direction? I know friction decelerates the object, but I cannot figure out if it is center of gravity or centripetal force that changes direction by overcoming the object's inertia. Also, what is the big difference...
I am sorry about that nonsensible thread I posted on here. I knew it was not a good topic, since it was a paradox, and in fact, I knew there was no answer because I heard thew same thing with an irrestible force colliding with a immovable object. I seemed to have done it anyway. Anyways, I am...
By the laws of scaling, what would it be like if an object with infinite strength (which does not exist) would try to support an object with infinite weight (also does not exist. I know, this is one of those 'this cannot happen because it is a paradox' things so please forgive me)
I dod not ask because I did not think gravity was the force that holds all stars. I asked because I read this article along time ago about astrophysics, where two astrophysicists from India had recently found a force that proves that gravity was not the force that holds planets and stars in...
Does anyone have the guts to think that gravity is not the universal force that holds planets and stars in place? I mean, gravity is an attractive force, but is there more than one force than just gravity that holds the universe toghether?
I heel help with my math, so if you could do the work for me, no just kidding! But seriously, I need help.
Find the slope of the line that passes through eash pair of points. Then determine whether the line rises to the right, falls to the right, is horizontal, or is vertical.
18. (6,1)...