Morbert's latest activity
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?."For successive, non-destructive projective measurements with discrete results, each measurement with measuring value can be regarded as... -
Morbert reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with
Like.
No! I'm not saying that. In fact, I don't believe that these operations have a physical meaning in the sense of action-at-a-distance or... -
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.@DrChinese As I have derailed this thread enough, I will start a new thread in the next couple of days to continue the discussion...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.I did not make anything up. I applied basic quantum mechanics to compute probabilities for possible sequences of measurement outcomes...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.There is absolutely a difference between the rotation of distinguishable vs rotation of indistinguishable particles. You cannot...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?."After passing through the PBS, the photons are rotated by HWPs to the |p/m〉 = 1√2 (|h〉 ± |v〉) polariza- tion basis. For reasons of...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.If they are initial states, then you do not get entanglement swapping. If they are not initial states, you get entanglement swapping. I...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.You're misinterpreting these states as initial states. These states as initial states cannot lead to entanglement swapping however it is...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.I am saying that, in Megedish's experiment, the rotation of indistinguishable particles (interference terms) vs the rotation of...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.I do not dispute any experimental facts. Everything I have said is fully consistent with Ma's paper. What I dispute is your incorrect...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.As an aside, forward-in-time accounts based on ordinary undergraduate-level formalisms of QM are perfectly capable of reproducing all...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.In both the Ma and Megidish experiment, the state of the biparticle system incident on Charles's apparatus is rotated during a...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.Classical examples are not used to explain Bell inequality violations. They are instead used to draw analogies in causal relations: In...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.We can construct similar statements for classical systems. In the past I have used Bertlemann's socks scenarios. Price + Wharton use a...