Morbert's latest activity

I have no idea what this is a response to.

But it does not give a complete characterization of quantum mechanics without the measurement device as a subsystem of the indivisible...

I can't comment directly until I've read that paper properly. I'll just make some general comments: Re/ Locality: The formalism should...

While it does not talk about the trajectory beyond what is minimally implied by the transition maps, it does commit to an ontology. At...

As an aside: Barandes derives a "dictionary" form for transition maps $$\Gamma_{ij}(t\leftarrow 0) = \mathrm{tr}P_i(t)P_j$$I anticipate...

@Sambuco Maybe the conversation can be refocused by telling me which statement you disagree with. i) The transition map of the entire...

I'm not sure what you mean by "the stochastic map is now [...]". The stochastic map of the universe ##\tilde{\Gamma}(t\leftarrow 0)## is...

The divisible subsystem transition map prevents the configuration of the subsystem from jumping across quasiclassical branches. The...

The divisible transition map of quasiclassical subsystems are near exact. This means they will effectively never fail. You would need to...

No continuity is assumed in this formalism. The near exactness of the divisible dynamics is enough to prevent jumping.

The transition maps across division events will prevent jumping.

We can derive the subsystem transition map from the larger unistochastic system a la section 3.7 in Barandes's paper. We can say it...

Both transition maps are nomologically valid for their purposes, and while the universe contains subsystems, this does not mean the...

In Barandes's formalism, interference terms in a quantum state encode the indivisibility of a stochastic process. From his...