Recent content by Navigateur

You have said much of nothing just now. The ONLY observed empirical data for quantum-level behaviour is apparently unpredictable behaviour. Nothing else. Quantum mechanics has never NEEDED anything more to "DO IT'S JOB PERFECTLY". The leaps of faith remind me of belief in God. People were...

Dear fluidistic, you said "Now why trust QM? As I said, it hasn't been showed wrong in its range of accuracy". That is the fundamental crux of your comment. And I point you again to the fact that I agree that its range of accuracy is shown to be right, and always will be, and I could produce a...

Dear fluidistic, your next decision is yours alone. You have COMPLETE knowledge of what it is, because you do it (I am talking about your IMMEDIATE next action). I'm not talking about anything outside of what you do. It's foundation is your desire and your state of understanding at that time...

Dear Studiot, members of a system have TENDENCIES, so their behaviour is not random. As individual beings, we know what we're going to do next, the people who know us extremely well MAY be able to predict this, to a limited degree, those who know us less well to an even less certain degree...

I realize this poster may no longer be on here but this debate is still "alive" in the world so I thought I'd reply because I'm baffled. I'm baffled because I can't believe there are still people who believe that actual "randomness" exists in the actual world. Let's take human behaviour as an...