Recent content by not my name

  1. N

    B Why does ##F## often appear as inverse square laws such as Newtonian gravity?

    Point particles exists. (Quote source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_particle#)
  2. N

    B Why does ##F## often appear as inverse square laws such as Newtonian gravity?

    (Oh, nevermind, it does diverge) Edit: WAIT nevermind I still don't get it. Suppose that a point is rapidly emitting photons at random directions every set interval. Of course there are finite photons in that point, right?
  3. N

    B Why does ##F## often appear as inverse square laws such as Newtonian gravity?

    ...y and Coulomb's law diverge as ##r\rightarrow##0? I mean, if a point light source emits light omnidirectionally, the intensity converges at the source, right? THIS is how I should've worded my previous post!
  4. N

    B What's "Coulomb's law but ##F## converges as ##r\rightarrow##0" called?

    No. (It's just something I came up with.)
  5. N

    B What's "Coulomb's law but ##F## converges as ##r\rightarrow##0" called?

    I mean the "one" where what ##F## converges to determines the strength of the charge.
  6. N

    B What's "Coulomb's law but ##F## converges as ##r\rightarrow##0" called?

    The thing inside the quotation mark in the title.
  7. N

    I Einstein's General Relativity w/o Cosmological Constant

    I mean, what's "general relativity but without the cosmological constant term" (##G_{\mu \nu}=\kappa T_{\mu \nu}##) called?
  8. N

    B What's "Coulomb's law but ##F## converges as ##r\rightarrow##0" called?

    And is that modified version of Coulomb's law "more accurate"? Edit: Same thing goes for Newtonian gravity, is "Newtonian gravity but ##F## converges as ##r\rightarrow##0" "more accurate"?
Back
Top