ojitojuntos's latest activity
-
ojitojuntos reacted to JesseM's post in the thread Neumaier Thermal Interpretation of QM, valid? with
Like.
But Neumaier says that his interpretation "acknowledges that there is only one world", and that it "is consistent with assigning a... -
ojitojuntos reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
Asher Peres (1978) Unperformed experiments have no results. Rudolf Peierls (1991) In defense of „measurement“.
-
ojitojuntos reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
More precisely, our best current theories of physics do not contain any action at a distance, at least for one common meaning of that...
-
ojitojuntos reacted to Fra's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
In the perspective of evolution of law, an answer was proposed here by Smolin "The view I will propose answers Wigner’s query about the...
-
ojitojuntos reacted to phinds's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
You have missed the point. The theory, that is the "shut up and calculate" math theory does NOT cause confusion and in fact is, as the...
-
ojitojuntos reacted to EPR's post in the thread I What are current Physicists' general positions on the Copenhagen Interpretation? with Like.
Well... yes. In its minimalist operational form, it makes no claims about reality, so it carries no excess "baggage" like many other...
-
ojitojuntos reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Relativistic Bohmian trajectories of photons via weak measurements with Like.
I thought it was obvious that I was kidding.
-
ojitojuntos reacted to martinbn's post in the thread I Relativistic Bohmian trajectories of photons via weak measurements with
Haha.
What I meant was that you misspelled "if". In your first post it should be spelled "though". -
Which is also missed by most of popularisations, and unfortunately a lot of physicists.
-
ojitojuntos reacted to bhobba's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
Of course they don't. But they have the power to suggest insight about the world we inhabit, and, if we are lucky, ways to test that...
-
ojitojuntos reacted to Lord Jestocost's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
Just a note regarding the term 'reality': One has to differentiate between agreement reality and experiential reality. Agreement...
-
ojitojuntos replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Hey, thanks for engaging with the thread! I’m not a physicist, but I’m really enjoying reading the discussion. I just wanted to make a...
-
ojitojuntos reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
My obligatory defense of consistent histories The consistent histories formalism is nonstandard in the sense that the construction of...
-
ojitojuntos reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
You mean a local hidden-variable theory cannot reproduce all of QM's predictions. A non-local hidden-variable theory can.
-
ojitojuntos reacted to PeroK's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
If I understand what you're saying, that sounds like the complement of @Demystifier argument. We start with a macroscopic system that...