Recent content by otagotasolo

didnt use in like for a decade but yes. talking of which: does this method work work well for the angles in the area where the tangent function looks quite like a line and stops working when it starts bending upwards and then go to infinity? (i mean the 90* which is half of the angle we...

regarding your 'long' message: I assumed that this is not working because otherwise it would be a known solution. but it felt really good (i used that for drawing, not for calculations)

it looks like drawn in the perspective so it "feels good" but the broader the angle the less equal the parts get.

ok i will try it

i don't think i am qualified for that. that's why i asked what is wrong about believing it might trisect the angle

thats the part i don't understand exactly. if i split the area into 3 parts, why the points where the lines touch the edge are not splitting the angle. is it because the angle connection between 2 upper contact points (between the lines and the square) would be round and the square is a straight...

ok, sorry for my English. Imagine capital A letter, the dash in the A would be the upper edge of the square

i mean that if there is an angle, one might construct an square between the lines of the angle and split this square into 3 parts. wouldn't be the lines trisecting the area trisect also the angle?

but one might put the square on the bottom of the angle where angle's bisection line comes in the middle of the square.

Hello everyone, i stumbled upon a trisection solution that was unknown to me and looked incredibly great (i am not an expert at all) http://andreasaronsson.com/guides/perspective-drawing/divide-into-equal-parts/ could someone please validate it and explain why it works and why it is not...