yes but I am not talking about what it can destroy in terms of human constructions, I am talking that the magnitude of earthquakes have enlarged because of ways to study earthquakes. we don't measure earthquake size by the damage it causes.
and medical science has nothing to do with human...
how, if, human population is exponential. and it is. if anything else is exponential relative to human population like disease, disasters etc... (disease and disasters, technology seem to be the topics I've observed with this same effect).
if you are talking about a computer generated number it can't predict the future. in essence, nothing can predict the future. a computer generated random number is filtered first through an equation. an equation is limited. therefore, the computer has an "Agenda" already, therefore not making it...
Originally Posted by Bedritsky
In Russia the number of damaging weather incidents logged in a year now averages more than one a day, said Bedritsky, who is also head of the Russian Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, Roshydromet.
"There's a constant increase...
well if you look at an asymptote line you would understand that the first few numbers seem small, until it grows to a scale unmeasurable. that's what I am trying to prove or at least get positive feed back on. I thought maybe someone else might notice it.
we don't have better recording or more often. we recorded earthquakes since paper was existed. the greater magnitude ones were recorded since 1100's. but we do have more reocorded incidences, just look at the records.
"When you consider the increase in population, the occurance of disease...
it seems the point's been lost. I am comparing "things" meaning everything to an asymptote line where -things and occurences versus time. it's only a comparison theory.
well that's what I've been doing is studying up on the increase of natural disasters and their damage and they have been tracking it for the past 1000 years. and their damage has increased because like yuo said, they weren't bad enough to record. and they were known 100's of years ago. actually...
but no absolutes do not exist. humans created mathematics as a guide to "measure", if absolutes exist, its because humans say they exist. absolutes are created by us.
pi is and is not a number. pi is a measurement of circular precision. i don't mean number as in the calculating end of things. it's infinite characteristic has more value then a simple/absolute number. where say 2 cannot be used for anything other than caculations.