Don't get me wrong, I'm really alright. It's just a case of the only way to motivate the intellectual is to wind him or her up a little. It was all done on purpose. Sorry folks.
That is what the interferometer does, by comparing path times. The answer is clear, just give me your email address and you shall receive a copy of the discovery.
PAN
I use the term MM to refer to all experiments. With the true speed of the Earth being 5500m/s on MM's day, and it varying sinusiodally during the year, this model (given the exact prediction of amplitude, phase and offset of MM original experiment) will undoubtably predict all the other...
The light beam from the source is straight, not diagonal. Move the apparatus, not the beam. It's true that the two (straight) beams strike the final lens side by side, but the lens integrates them.
The reason for the beam striking the mirror off centre is because of the slew effect of the...
The beam does not strike the 45 degree mirror in its centre. Computer simulation has been carried out, producing the associated graph in the appendix. Regardless of how many experiments and readings have been carried out, the maths have changed, not the experimental results. These maths will fit...
It's the mathematical model of the MMX that is wrong, that used to decide upon relativity. Not the question of an aether or not.
A correct interpretation will cause the whole house to come down, and it has. And of course, Einstein admitted later in life that he had read the MMX prior to his...
Read the paper. My file is too large to leave here. Leave you email address and I'll send it to you. You can't get somewhere without applying yourself. Short sentences here are not prodcutive enough.
Paul
Apply it to the photo electric effect. Why do you add adjacent electric fields together. They only sum when integrated by a surface. The reality is that they travel in quanta wave bundles.
All of you, except one so far, on this site, like arguing but are scared of getting results due to a...
Look, the point is that you only need one reference point and it can be anywhere, the outcome will always be accounted for. You appear to be a novice, why don't you use a piece of paper next time you have a thought, to work it out, instead of merely throwing the idea at someone else in search...
Thank you for the history lesson, but you ought to get your facts straighter. The whole point why SR is no good is that it relies upon a frame of reference. Maxwell equations (which I understand perfectly, having worked as an RF engineer) merely shows the osillatory nature of EM. What people...
Well,Well, I was certain that 90% of all products, were developed by the engineer, along with most great discoveries, mathematical or otherwise. But then I don't wish to harp on about this as I know how upsetting it is for you people. You know what they say though - An engineer will take...