Recent content by peaco99
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
No he doesn't. But if I accept that to be true, Then I can see it. BTW, may I ask your physics education level? Thanks.- peaco99
- Post #15
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
No, Sakurai, or in my notes, is \hat{A}\hat{A}^\dagger ever defined. I just assumed because it is anti"unitary", it is either 1 or -1, the -1 maybe coming from "funny" properties of antiunitary operators. So I'm guessing -1 isn't an option then <\Psi|\hat{A}|\Psi> =...- peaco99
- Post #13
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
Well \hat{A}\hat{A}^\dagger either equals +1 or -1 in either case i'd get: <\Psi|\hat{A}^\dagger|\Psi> = <\Psi|-\hat{A}^2\hat{A}^\dagger|\Psi> = <\Psi|-\hat{A}\hat{A}\hat{A}^\dagger|\Psi> = 1) for the -1 case: <\Psi|-\hat{A}\hat{A}\hat{A}^\dagger|\Psi> = <\Psi|\hat{A}|\Psi> which...- peaco99
- Post #11
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
I don't know how you got \hat{I}= -\hat{A}^\dagger\hat{A} , this would imply that \hat{A}^2= \hat{A}^\dagger, but anyways if you use this all I get is (<\Psi|\hat{A}|\Psi>)^\dagger = (<\Psi|-\hat{A}^\dagger\hat{A}\hat{A}|\Psi>)^\dagger = (<\Psi|-\hat{A}^\dagger\hat{A}^2|\Psi>)^\dagger =...- peaco99
- Post #9
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
I'm sorry I was equating the inverse with the adjoint(transpose conjugate). So my problem still becomes that when I get the transpose conjugate in the problem, I don't know how to handle it. Like I mentioned before, Sakurai and my class claims we will never defIne the way an antiunitary operator...- peaco99
- Post #7
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
Are you saying K^2=A^2= -I? Because the problem only states that A^2=-I, and the problem never mention what A is, other than it being antiunitary, I brought in the K operator as an attempt at solving the problem. In regards to your hint, everytime I try and work with the inner product, or in...- peaco99
- Post #5
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
No restrictions on psi, in fact it says to show this for all psi in the hilbert space. All the problem states is that A is anti-unitary, A^2= -I, and show that A|psi> is orthogonal to |psi>.- peaco99
- Post #3
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Proving Orthogonality of $\hat{A}|\Psi>$ with Anti-Unitary Operator $\hat{A}$
Homework Statement \hat{A} is an anti-unitary operator, and it is known that \hat{A^2}= -\hat{I}, show that |\Psi> is orthogonal to \hat{A}|\Psi> Homework Equations I know that \hat{A} can be represented by a unitary operator, \hat{U}, and the complex conjugation operator, \hat{K}...- peaco99
- Thread
- Operator Orthogonality
- Replies: 15
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help