PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.Because one event would have to happen first. And you know the experimental error on simultaneity. The experiment should break the... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.PS note that an infinite speed is meaningless in terms of a signal. So that's just another way to say "nonlocal".
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.The bigger problem is that for spacelike separated events, relatively says that the order is frame dependent. Neither happens first. So...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.That's slightly disengenuous, given that Newton himself despaired over his own theory of gravity for those reasons. And, given that a...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Find f(z) given f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x,y).Okay, I see now that you are dealing with analytic functions. Wherever ##x## appears, it always appears with ##+iy##. The function has...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Find f(z) given f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x,y).These are analytic functions. That explains it.
-
PeroK replied to the thread Change in Displacement Formulation.The two calculations have a different initial velocity. Your initial formula should be: $$x = (v_0(t_2) + \frac 1 2 at_2^2) - (v_0(t_1)...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Find f(z) given f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x,y).I don't see how it's valid to set ##y = 0##. For example, it doesn't work here: $$f(z) = x + 2iy \ \implies \ f(x) = x \ \implies \ f(z)...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?.That's correct. The problem with postulating a causal process is that a measurement of spin is usually done indirectly. The...
-
PeroK reacted to syed's post in the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition? with
Like.
I'm having trouble making sense of any of the interpretations of QM (I'm still new to this) and wanted clarity as to whether or not the... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Freefall and gravity.The ground applies an upward force on an object. That stops it falling any further. If there is a hole in the ground the objects falls...
-
Objects "experiencing gravity", whether in freefall or not, is not part of the theory of general relativity; it's a misunderstanding...
-
This intro thread is now closed. :wink:
-
PeroK replied to the thread A. R. Chohan, Independent Researcher.For example, in the Big Bang theory, physicists have already projected as far back as our current theories allow. New theories are...
-
PeroK replied to the thread A. R. Chohan, Independent Researcher.First, I don't believe those quotations you attribute to Lord Kelvin. I suspect they are apocryphal. For example, Lord Kelvin knew that...