PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to bhobba's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with
Like.
All experience says it is. What Wigner said still holds: https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/wigner.pdf In my opinion... -
PeroK reacted to martinbn's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
I am not sure how useful these surveys are. There isn't enough clarification about the meaing of terms in the questions and answers. So...
-
PeroK reacted to syed's post in the thread I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition? with
Sad.
It is hard to distinguish between wrong interpretations and correct but unintuitive interpretations. I think that a lot of people just... -
PeroK reacted to jedishrfu's post in the thread The Guardian Investigates Student Use of ChatGPT for 18 months with Like.
It wasn't a scientific investigation. The journalist convinced three students to allow the journalist to view their chat conversations...
-
PeroK reacted to jedishrfu's post in the thread The Guardian Investigates Student Use of ChatGPT for 18 months with
Informative.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jul/27/it-wants-users-hooked-and-jonesing-for-their-next-fix-are-young-people-becoming-too-re... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….In my opinion, soundbites like "shut up and calculate" or "spooky action at a distance" are ultimately meaningless. They represent the...
-
PeroK reacted to syed's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Informative.
"shut up and calculate" is often related to the Copenhagen interpretation. The term comes from David Mermin and he coined it to...
-
PeroK reacted to bhobba's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
Actually, over the years, I have changed my view on QM interpretations. I still hold to the Ensemble interpretation. However, I no...
-
PeroK reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences? with Like.
Yes, the instrumentalist version of Copenhagen interpretation is OK, I have no objections against it. Essentially, the instrumentalist...
-
This is the nature v nurture debate isn't it? Can you fight nature and is worth it? How much can you increase your ability...
-
PeroK reacted to MrRobotoToo's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
That's right: a superdeterministic model would be completely deterministic in the classical sense. However, no one knows how to...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….Not necessarily. SD only determines the necessary correlations to make it look like QM is right. There are no macroscopic...
-
PeroK reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences? with Informative.
Maybe "one of the few elaborated accounts of Bohr's variant of the Copenhagen interpretion" would be a better description. Which is...
-
PeroK reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences? with Like.
Chapter 12 of Asher Peres's "Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods" gives a concrete account of measurement from a modern instrumentalist...
-
PeroK reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread A How Does MWI explain Type I PDC Photon Polarization Entanglement? with Like.
I think that's the source of your confusion. The branches don't "interact" (or more precisely, don't interfere) with each other when...