PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK replied to the thread B Newton's first law?.See my post #2 about a more modern interpretation. In an inertial frame of reference an object obeys Newton's first law. The danger, as... -
PeroK replied to the thread B Schrödinger's cat question.I think you've missed the point of the thought experiment. -
PeroK reacted to UyScuti's post in the thread B If the Universe has a cause, what caused that cause? with
Agree.
I’d venture that this is unanswerable and not an object of scientific pursuit. Had you asked “how,” perhaps something could be said. But... -
PeroK replied to the thread B Newton's first law?.I agree. They are subtly different, I would say. -
PeroK replied to the thread A Crisis for Newly Minted CompSci Majors -- entry level jobs gone.That's the sort of thing that happens on IT projects! -
PeroK replied to the thread B Newton's first law?.See post #2 where I said: It doesn't matter whether you start with "Young and Randall" or start with "Serway". You end up with the... -
PeroK reacted to Ibix's post in the thread I Conventionality of the One-Way Speed of Light with
Like.
It's not necessarily the one-way speed, but it is necessarily the two-way speed of light. What your maths tells you, in short, is that... -
PeroK replied to the thread B Newton's first law?.The motion of the planets relies on the gravitational force to keep them in an elliptical orbit. The point that Newton is making is that... -
PeroK reacted to wrobel's post in the thread B Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it? with
Like.
The 3 body problem was the first example on which people became aware of what dynamical chaos is. The effect of separatrices... -
PeroK reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread B Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it? with
Like.
Oh, it's definitely solvable, and we know how to solve it. So your conclusion is correct, but I don't see how it follows from your...