PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK replied to the thread Help me understand why “Block Universe” is not scientifically proven.For me, these questions are more philosophical than physical. And there are, effectively, no answers in philosophy - only opinions and... -
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay with
Like.
There is no such thing. Energy and time are not complementary observables, so there is no uncertainty relation between them. Indeed... -
PeroK replied to the thread Making the denominator of a certain fraction real.##zz^*## is always real.
-
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
So basically, on the "principle account" view, entanglement in QM is viewed as analogous to, say, relativity of simultaneity, length...
-
PeroK replied to the thread Different way to find center of mass of Hollow hemisphere.Maths and physics are hard enough without doing things the wrong way!
-
PeroK replied to the thread Help me understand why “Block Universe” is not scientifically proven.Let's take non-determinism to mean that two identical experiments can have different outcomes. The universe as a whole is essentially a...
-
PeroK reacted to Filip Larsen's post in the thread On writing with AI: The Devil is in my foyer, do I invite him in? with Like.
I think there is a difference between using the AI as an advanced search machine where you ask it for specific factual data that you can...
-
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
I don't think this is true. I believe robotic machines have been developed which can flip coins such that one side is more likely to...
-
PeroK reacted to jhonconnor's post in the thread I Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment) with Like.
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is...
-
PeroK reacted to jhonconnor's post in the thread I Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment) with
Informative.
Well, I found that it's due the contribution of other states. In other words, for energies below 1 MeV, ##^3\mathrm{S}_1## and... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Okay. Let me read your paper. I'm just up the road from you, climbing mountains in Slovenia for the past couple of weeks.
-
PeroK reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Informative.
I have addressed this in post #25. In item 1. I gave a reference where your question is answered in more detail and in item 3. I gave an...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I'm not saying it's impossible. But, if the state of the detector is irrelevant, then the Born rule makes sense. Only the state of the...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I understand your point. Let's assume you are correct. The detector has trillions of possible states, but these neatly divide into two...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.To change the subject slightly. I remember learning about neutrino oscillations and thinking what a beautiful, simple model. The...