Recent content by Philosopha

Thanks for that reply Tom.

Merely I'm saying facts are the best providers of answers. One doesn't even need to interpret anything into the clock experiment. The results are as they are. Equating frequency (here of clock) with energy content is just an old basic.

I do not claim to know the why nor that I got any calculations to work. So ? By the guidelines of Physicsforum one is not ment to discuss any personal unpublished hypothesis I was told. So I was just presenting some definite facts with the atomic clocks. Facts are always good. My sentence you...

Calculating experimental results however from the vantage point of changes in energy/mass content translated into frequency if achieved would allow for an interpretation as of the why. It must be rational and calculated, or it is not an answer.

What seems not possible today might be possible tomorrow. No question should be surrendered to Metaphysics.

Wikipedia showes a "mass" (not particle!) ratio of 2:1 at the time when the CMB was emitted. The graph includes a large portion of photon/neutrino mass thus tipping the ratio to 2:1, if including these particles. A friend already explained to me that this was so, because Photons at that age had...

And if something calculates the right amount, maybe that would also give an idea.

Thank you very much for everything - I will definitely come back to that topic once I studied my way through GR. It is good that you mentioned the "why". Lots of people are thinking about that. I believe there is a why and maybe that observations/ facts will give us an idea.

Home with little children at the moment :/ - otherwise academia but biology - friend of mine lectures Physicist and I hope will help. Would it be better to publish when I'm back at work, even if it was as a Biology Academic staff or Postdoc ec.? I have published as a Biologist before. Or would I...

What about the fact that atomic clocks after an experiment can be put next to each other on a table, be examined and leave no doubt, that they have recorded the absolute value of the relative difference between their prior frames? The clock at height of our foot experiences less oszillation...

What is the observed DM ratio in CMB ? Is there observational evidence for the DM ratio in the CMB? Other then the info-graph from Wikipedia which I was explained is based on the assumption of DM being the same total amount back then but the mass of relativistic particles was higher. Would...

You picked something there I believe: "mask". - Very much the essence of what I am wondering about.

Great info -thx - now I need more time

Thank you both, and thank you very much for the paper. Will have a good read. The acceleration -DE context sounds exactly what I stumbeled across.

What can I ask for the observable universe? Considering there is no meaningful way to express the expansion as a kinetic object. The observable universe is what I'm after. So is there any energy associated with its expansion or not? - Because I was told there is just the way I did it is wrong...