thanks for the reply. yeah i think it was leonard susskinds holographic principle that i must have not understood. thanks for the suggestion about the book also.
if black holes are 2 dimensional representations of our 3 dimensional universe, does that make our universe a 3 dimensional representation existing on the edge of (or entirely inside) a 4 dimensional universe? or to a 4th dimensional being would our 3 dimensional universe be considered a "black...
well antimatter and matter might just be our words for something else that needs more definition. could there big an explosion big enough to be the big bang if a membrane composed of matter and a membrane composed of antimatter bounced against each other?
edit: i like the way this guy smolin...
thank you both for the quick replies. its fun discussing ideas together. would it even be possible as we know it for antimatter to react in such a way to help cause the big bang yet also be at the center of a black hole? i don't know why i made the connection of the two either it just seemed...
thank you for the very quick replies. =]
i was wondering how many more categories(?) of matter are there? all the matter we can detect with our senses, antimatter, and also dark matter? are there anymore known to science that i am not aware of?
watching too much science channel on tv they have been running cosmology and space shows at night this whole week. this is what was on last night.
http://science.discovery.com/tv-schedules/series.html?paid=48.16348.25867.36228.x
anyway in one of the episodes they said (or i heard it as) that...