So it does not matter if a paper is published in a peer-reviewed academic journal then but rather if the moderators approve of it. That is not a standard.
E&E is a legitimate peer reviewed journal
So? If I am a member of the NRA doe that mean my science is now funded by them? Obviously not. So unless you can prove the science was funded by them you have nothing. The Heartland institute considering him an expert does not make him even associated...
Exxon is a publicly traded company. Which is irrelevant to a subjective listing.
According to whom? You? Who determines what is "standard"?
That is because you need to do better research than Wikipedia. EVERY journal has a political agenda, there is no such thing has a non-biased source. What...
Um no...
ISI is owned by Thomson Reuters a private corporation and they can subjectively choose to list whomever they want. There is no "standard".
Energy & Environment is refereed no matter how bad you don't want it to be.
The Heartland Institute is a nonprofit research and education organization to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions to social and economic problems. If you are associated with it you merely support these positions. None of which has to do with a science discussion.
That is not true.
Energy & Environment is a peer-reviewed journal (ISSN: 0958-305X)
- Indexed in Compendex, EBSCO, Environment Abstracts, Google Scholar, IngentaConnect and SCOPUS
- http://www.ebscohost.com/titleLists/eih-coverage.pdf" (PDF)