Recent content by Soule

I was thinking that too >.> lol.

Oh ok. That happens the instant the core reaches its Scwarzschild radius. I should have figured that out as that is the one thing about black holes I can calculate XD.

OH! This reminds me. There may not be small enough and stable enough black holes to produce those tidal forces, however what about when a black hole begins forming inside of a star? I'm not sure how it forms exactly (outside of the mass collapsing under its own gravity of course), but i...

To everyone else: Yeah. That clarification of potential energy cleared things right up. Thanks for the help! I learned a lot! By far the neatest thing I learned was that gravity was far more literally a "negative energy" than I had originally pictured. This is useful :3.

Ah. Sorry. I had not been exposed to the language yet. It just was what made sense to me.

"Fry, for the love of god , I can't teach! I'm a professor!" -Prof. Hubert J. Farnsworth

:/ how would you describe the concept?

I have taken classes. In none of them was the concept described like this. This makes more sense. Though to be fair, my professor for the class that covered it was a consultant for cern and had very little interest in his students. This class was happening when cern thought it had measured...

I edited to say: You could also react the word "energy" with "temperature" in my previous post and it conveys the same concept.

Isn't potential energy the direct result of gravitational energy?

Lol woah man I'm a layman. I said so from the start. Be gentle. I'm here to learn XD I stated the idea in as efficient a language as I knew how. Let me restate. If you have a block of wood among smaller blocks of wood, that block look bigger in comparison. If you take that same block and...

Lol I'm a philosopher. :p. Physics is a hobby. Thanks for the tip though! But there is still the problem of the gravity well consuming the particles brought about by its own gravity, and increasing mass because it instead of canceling. Also I don't understand. The strong force field...

Oh yes. Then I guess that is exactly what I mean. I was thinking that it was like comparing the energy of an object in a high energy environment to the energy of an object in a low energy environment. It would appear lower in the high energy environment, but in truth its energy is the same in...

I dint think this analogy works because a new particle forms with its own potential energy leaving the original hadron (am i using that right?) With it's original energy. Forgive me. I'll have to rethink this when i have slept. I have a night schedule and it's past bedtime and i can hardly think.

Yes I understand. What i meant is the environment changes. Not the energy of the photon.