Recent content by thedragonbook

Ok fine I had made up my mind. I am WRONG. Your example proves everything for all times and the topic of Theory of Everything is closed per your argument. Happy?

Well I had some thoughts and posted those thoughts to seek evidence for them. Doesn't mean that I have made up my mind. Now we are totally deviating from the forum topics here. Just let it go.

I am not claiming anything! I am just asking a question.

Reading "More is Different" essay now.

I did a search on PF for "theory of everything" but there are way too many results. I did go through a couple of them but couldn't find what I was looking for. I also didn't understand what you meant by "FDR by argument". I did a google search for the same but I don't understand the slang...

Are you saying that your example is against the claim that there can be a Theory of Everything? If there can be a Theory of Everything, which is the holy grail of physics, then sure there will be laws that describe both the superconductor and the ordinary metal connected to it. Rephrasing my...

Ah, you are posing the question back to me now :)

Ok fine, forget freewill or humans or universe being a single entity. What about my first question? Are there any physics theories out there that theorize that if two objects are connected, then they should share the same physical laws? I understand that the physical laws are the same for...

Not only laws of heaven and earth, what about freewill? Do all humans also fall under the power of these laws? If yes, then isn't the entire universe a single entity being governed by these laws?

Hi, Consider the various kinds of objects we have in our universe, from the smallest to the largest - sub-atomic particles, atoms, molecules, single-celled organism, multi-celled organisms, cities, countries, planets, stars, solar systems, galaxies, collection of galaxies, universe. Since...

I don't mean the imaginary number "i". I meant to say some thing that is just an idea - an imagination.

What would be the implications of assuming the existence of an imaginary number that can divide a prime number and is related to the number it is dividing? By imaginary I mean a number that is just in our imagination and not the imaginary number "i".

Do you know what infinite means?

Yes, exactly. That is the paradox isn't it? There are an infinite amount of intervals between two points but its still possible to move from one to another which implies that there weren't an infinite number to begin with?

Came across this video which says that a moving object has to cover infinitely many intervals in order to get from one point to another and because of this motion couldn't really take place and since it does take place, its a paradox. youtube.com/watch?v=u42Y3RbP7JE Since motion does take...