Again, with the constant acceleration of the airplane, wouldn't the change in flux linkage be constant, making for a constant voltage as opposed to an increasing one?
I think i understand now, because the wire is accelerating, the rate of change of the area swept by the wire is increasing, so faradays law works, as flux linkage is proportional to B and A, not just B.
Is the explanation using lorenzt force invalid then?
Apologies, I've never come across the equation emf = blv. I instead referred to the equation F = bqv, for an electron, and how the wire is made up of these electrons.
The differentiations made little sense to me, do you think you could explain it starting with the knowledge I've spoken about...
A student in my physics class posted, in a group, a wrong answer to a question.
The situation was: A plane has a wire extended between the tips of its wings and flies through a magnetic field, perpendicularly, while accelerating.
The question was: What will be the induced current?
His answer...