argh...
yes. I just checked the errata and it indeed is 2n and not 2^n.
Well, given that it is 2n, does anybody have any ideas how to prove it using Riemann sums.
I have been working on this problem for a while.
I am supposed to prove that
log 2 = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n+1} + \frac{1}{n+2} + ... + \frac{1}{2^n}.
The problem is that I have a hard time figuring out how I am supposed to prove that something is equal to a transcendental...
Well, I don't know why it is twice more. That is the problem. It seems that r should be 2m for sure. I suppose it could be F since the gravity is only acting on half the mass?
Hi
I have a problem for which the given solution makes no sense to me.
A 200 kg plank of length 2m is attached by a hinge at one of its ends to a wall. It is held in place horizontally by a string. The string breaks and I am supposed to find the torque at that point. (See attached image)...
Theoretical Physics with little or no math is an oxymoron.
Theoretical physics really is only math and how the mathematical results could apply to the world.
That depends... I would say if you want to work on theoretical aspects of quantum computing (algorithms and general theory) it would be mathematics. If you are interested in the technical aspects then it would be physics or electrical engineering although I would lean towards physics.
In this case you should look for a new educational consultant... I am sure top tier Canadian institutions are on par with ours. And with knowing how to plug in numbers into an equation you are not going to get far anywhere in the world...
I know two people who went to a CC. One of them went to CMU for CS and the other to Harvard. Most of their courses were accepted since they were lower level courses.