Recent content by UnitedRising

(Note that personal theories are not permitted on PF, if that's what this is an attempt at.) I ask because i want to know, is all.

relatively speaking, the faster an object moves is used to describe the relative kinetic energy increase proportional to speed. Can not the relative atomic density times the speed of the vibration of particles also determine potential kinetic energy?

Taking a guess at a formula to describe this theory...probably need help to refine it... energy = matter, condensed squared right? e=mc2 so e=mc2=DxV where D is atomic density and V is Vibration, and mc2 describes the atomic level; while DxV describes particles at the sub atomic level.

point taken...

Right, the normal ideas of states of matter are transformed, molecular bonds mean nothing, usually it is a star, gravity versus fusion explosions of energy. When fusion wins, super nova throw heavy elements into the universe, When gravity wins, neutron star. What if, when there is enough mass...

Yes, I know. I am asking about the actual singularity. Is what makes this awesome gravity called a black hole a form of mass with particles so tightly condensed they almost stop vibrating from super gravity it forms super gravity? Super dense matter with minimal kinetic energy, formed when...

No, I think you are the only one that has correctly interpreted my question. I am wondering if the mass that makes black holes would be super dense matter condensed past the point of fusion at low temp. due to shear size?

"The laws of thermodynamics state that absolute zero cannot be reached because this would require a thermodynamic system to be fully removed from the rest of the universe. A system at absolute zero would still possesses quantum mechanical zero-point energy. While molecular motion would not cease...

if matter is energy at a slow vibration, what happens with no vibration? would matter not vibrating be super dense? can vibration replace dark matter in equations?