weirdoguy's latest activity
-
It doesn't. Several posts have already done that: Demystifier's #71, multiple posts from multiple people suggesting that you draw a... -
weirdoguy reacted to user079622's post in the thread I Topic about physics axioms, theory, laws etc.. with
Sad.
Neither once, because I know from logic/experience that this experiment doesn't make sense. Experiment will shows that theory is wrong... -
weirdoguy reacted to user079622's post in the thread I Topic about physics axioms, theory, laws etc.. with
Skeptical.
No. If you throw coin many times, it will lands on both sides. If you measure torque, it will show the result T=Fxr absolutely every... -
To be honest, no one will remember him in a hundred years because he was a talentless hack and his band's music was utter garbage...
-
I'm germ-free, I guess.
-
How could there be 81 posts on this?
-
The forces between the strings and the two end connections of the scale are two third law pairs. What's the difference? Look at any...
-
You are confusing the 3rd Law with the 2nd Law. Two forces acting on the same piece of string are not a 3rd Law pair. 3rd Law pair...
-
weirdoguy reacted to SergejMaterov's post in the thread I Would gravitons theoretically act like photons? with Skeptical.
You can of course be skeptical about my previous post, but: If it does exist, then formally the "graviton" should be very similar to the...
-
I don't know many many times and how many different ways it needs to be explained.
-
weirdoguy reacted to SergejMaterov's post in the thread I Would gravitons theoretically act like photons? with Skeptical.
I think it is too early to talk about "graviton" at all for obvious reasons: 1. quantum gravity has not been built 2. "graviton" has not...
-
weirdoguy reacted to Catastrophe's post in the thread B Flatlander analogy of spherical surface as observable universe with Skeptical.
Not to worry. I am happy with my position on this. Thanks for your comments. Cat :) :) :)
-
weirdoguy replied to the thread I Problem in understanding instantaneous velocity.No, the limit of those lines is the tangent line. You are confusing limit with the sequence and whether or not it's part of the...
-
weirdoguy reacted to Gavran's post in the thread I Problem in understanding instantaneous velocity with Skeptical.
No, it does not. The limit means that the secant line approaches the tangent line, but it never becomes the tangent line.
-
weirdoguy reacted to Mike_bb's post in the thread I Problem in understanding instantaneous velocity with
Like.
No. Limit doesn't mean the process of approaching to the tangent line itself. Limit is just a number (coefficient of tangent line slope).