Recent content by yanniru

  1. Y

    Compactified String Theories - Generic Predictions for Particle Physics

    A review paper by Bobby Samir Acharya, Gordon Kane and Piyush Kumar http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.2795v1.pdf 12 April 2012 This is my first post here in a long time. I learned of this paper from yesterday's Lubos Motl blog. It is the most instructive string theory paper I have ever read...
  2. Y

    Scientific American Partnership

    No more crackpot theories. And I thought I was kicked off long ago. Just when I have a real good 26d string cosmology. yanniru
  3. Y

    Can Compact Dimensions be Explained in Terms of Rudimentary Field Theory?

    I may be able to help you visualize the compactified dimensions. In my opinion, the most important aspect of compactified space is that it still exists as a discrete subspace throughout all space. Depending on how the original dimension broke up into pieces of space, that subspace could be a...
  4. Y

    Selectrons as the particles of Dark Energy

    Thank you for the critique. I just noticed from the paper of Carlos and Diaz that selectrons are charged [http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/9511/9511421v1.pdf ] I had expected zero charge along with zero spin. I had not considered the energy consideration and was more concerned with pair...
  5. Y

    Selectrons as the particles of Dark Energy

    Well, I suppose that's one way to handle "crackpot" ideas
  6. Y

    Selectrons as the particles of Dark Energy

    I have been removed from this forum for previous "crackpot" ideas. However, I would appreciate a review of the one presented below. I submit it to this subforum because it is based on superstring theory. Selectrons as the particles of Dark Energy Consider the creation of particle pairs in...
  7. Y

    Why not two or more time dimensions?

    It seems that arivero is contradicting coalquay404 who in answer to my question said that 26-d string theory has only had one time dimension.
  8. Y

    Why not two or more time dimensions?

    I recall that the original 26-d closed string theory had two time dimensions as well as tachyons and was considered undesirable for both reasons. Does anyone have a similar recollection? However, in reading Lisa Randall's book "Warped Passages", the claim is made that 26-d theory has but one...
  9. Y

    Our universe should be called multiverse and not universe

    I am suprised that there is no mention of Lisa randall, etal, in this discussion who postulates that our universe is a 3-d brane in larger dimensions
  10. Y

    Loop Quantum Cosmology dual to Randall-Sundrum Model

    Specifically LGC is dual to RS theory with an extra (large) time-like dimension, as reported by Parampreet Singh today in: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0603/0603043.pdf This is the first connection between loop quantum gravity and string theory that I am aware of. The need for an...
  11. Y

    Dark matter, dark energy & gravity

    Chronos or anybody, is it true that there is no DM associated with spherical galaxies? I ask Chrnons because he mentioned that different amounts of DM are expected for different galaxies.
  12. Y

    Dark matter candidates, what chances would you give them?

    DM Constituents Since I am a layman, I have no right to do this. Nonetheless, I put my money on a mixture of several components: LSP Axions Mirror Matter but hedge my bet with Bekenstein's MOND
  13. Y

    Quantum Gravity and the Standard Model (Sundance + PI)

    Lubos Motl makes fun of this paper on his blog today (i.e., QG & SM) http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/sf/frames.html
  14. Y

    Dark matter, dark energy & gravity

    Could someone comment on Jakob Bekenstein's last few papers which attribute Dark Matter to theoretical artifact; http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0412652, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509519, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602266?
  15. Y

    Process Physics: Exploring Information Theoretic Models

    Reginald Cahill derived a non-symmetric form of General Relativity from Process Physics [see e.g., http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0307003] similar to what John Moffat has been publishing for years [see e.g., http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0506370] and what Jakob Bekenstein recently published [...
Back
Top