Recent content by Yian The Craft

Well it seems then that there are more mechanisms for energy loss.Could you please try and list them *all* or as many as you know here?

Thanks for that. But still... If we assume that: 1.the springs are perfectly elastic 2.There is no sphere-oil friction 3.No coil resistance Why would it not work.

OK.If we assume that: 1.the springs are perfectly elastic 2.There is no sphere-oil friction 3.No coil resistance Why would it not work.(I did not really understand that last paragraph). @Antonio: you mean plasma things are perpetual motion??

I do not understand.Oil will not corrode the springs,as they will be made from a conducting metal.Also,why remove them? And thirdly,as I said before,the shape I think would be best is cuboid.Instead of a sphere,we can have a cuboid.(read my last post!) Antonio,your idea will require energy to...

Can you please explain more fully?I am assuming there's oil in there,as well.It will prevent corrosion of the spring,if that's what you're wondering.It's lift force or upthrust of floatation will hopefully counter gravity.Also,I was thiking,to reduce energy loss via spinning,I thought maybe we...

Please let us concentrate on the possibility that the charge will eventually slow down its up down motion and stays floating motionless.Could you explain exactly how the charge distribution would happen,as I do not have a full knowledge on charge distribution.

Well firstly I am not sure if it is indeed AC.If it is could it not be rectified?

**deleted** Firstly I must apologize to the moderators,and of course to you who are viewing this thing.I am very sorry for this,and I understand completely if you delete the thread,however I believe the URL above is amazing and it is a pity not share it with as many people as possible.

"Sorry if you took offense; none was intended." Strange,I was about to write that same line.In any case,no offense taken.To return to the topic at hand,was Leibnitz not Newton's rival?I think he was,and they often made similar discoveries via different routes,but at about the same time...

Is that not the equation for KE but without the 0.5 at the front?

I thought kinetic energy was 0.5(mv^2)

It produces electricity by itself.Supposedly.But come on,I mean it can't possibly work so can someone explain why?

So don't be surprised if it's crap.In fact I know it's crap,I just need proper physics people to confirm it's crapness. :redface: Think of a hollow cylinder.There are springs on the bottom and top surfaces of the cylinder,meaning that if a ball was inside it would bounce back and forth.It is...