To make my point that we have already defined at minimum 2D time, I need to further explain what has happened, in case people still don't understand.
(1) Imagine we have only one dimension to time. This forms only an x axis. You might think - negative x goes on to infinity, and positive x...
...you didn't notice what I just displayed, or what is going on when you look only at time in combination with these three ordered event theories...
Imagine again time is the playhead on a video. What happens as time progresses? The playhead advances. That playhead, by itself, is one...
...Side note for physicists that I wonder about:
Another thing I am interested in understanding is this: Hawking wanted a single equation to describe the universe. Given we should make things "as simple as possible but no simpler", what I have found as a pattern in physics that people see but...
I have a question regarding LQC that I can't find anywhere, and since most of the relevant answers to similar questions are here I may as well ask, here...
For a simple background, when I was introduced to the big rip and combined that with the big bang, I immediately thought the two co-existed...
I guess I should clarify the problem domain after looking back at this to simplify the required solution...
I have three variables derived from any set 'x': x, e, and a.
After the set X1...XN (where all members of X are greater than or equal to zero) is established, I then determine the total...
(sorry in advance for not knowing how to use laTex and also not knowing calculus, I thought maybe before I teach myself calculus to figure out this one problem maybe you all could fill in what I'm not figuring out... Thanks in advance...)
I recently found out that I needed to know calculus in...