Power factor at half power points for RLC circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the power factor of a series RLC circuit when the dissipated power decreases by a factor of two as the frequency changes from resonant to non-resonant. The original poster presents their calculations and expresses confusion regarding the discrepancy between their result and the textbook answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between power at resonant and non-resonant frequencies, questioning the interpretation of the "factor of two" in the context of power. Some participants provide detailed calculations while others offer alternative perspectives on the problem setup.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with some participants providing complete solutions and others questioning specific steps in the reasoning. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas regarding the calculations and assumptions involved in determining the power factor.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the implications of resonant and non-resonant conditions in RLC circuits, as well as the role of complex power and impedance in the calculations. The original poster's confusion about the textbook answer highlights potential gaps in understanding the problem's requirements.

Loki
Can anyone help me with this homework problem? I worked it through, but the answer i get doesn't agree with the answer the book gives. I'll include my work, and if anyone can help, I'll be eternally grateful, at least for a while.

The Problem:

In a series RCL circuit the dissapated power drops by a factor of two when the frequency of the generator is changed from the resonant frequency to a nonresonant frequency. The peak voltage is held constant while this change is made. Determine the power factor of the curcuit at nonresonant frequency.​

My Work:

P_r = 2 P_{nr}
P = I * V * \cos \phi
\phi = \arctan \frac{X_L - X_C}{R}
At resonant frequency, X_L - X_C = 0
I * V * \cos ( \arctan \frac{X_L-X_C}{R} ) = 2 * I * V \cos (\arctan\frac{X_L-X_C}{R})
I * V * \cos ( \arctan (0)) = 2 * I * V \cos (\arctan\frac{X_L-X_C}{R})
I * V * \cos (0) = 2 * I * V \cos (\phi)
1 = 2 \cos (\phi)
\cos \phi = \frac{1}{2}

This seems correct to me, but the book says the answer is \frac{\sqrt {2}}{2}

Am I mistaking the "Factor of two" part of the problem? Does this really mean that the power is squared?


If anybody can help, thanks. On a sidenote, LaTeX is very nice, if a bit tedious to write in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A complete solution is offered.

At resonance the current is in phase with the voltage source, and the power factor is 1. In that case the power dissipated is simply

##P_o = \frac{V^2}{R}~~~##where ##R## is the circuit resistance and ##V## the fixed voltage.

We are looking for the power factor for the situation where the dissipated power drops by a factor of two. That is,

## P = \frac{P_o}{2} = \frac{V^2}{2R}##

Off-resonance there will be a net reactance, X. We won't worry about the individual reactances of the inductance and capacitance, only their net effect. Let:

##Z = R + j X## be the impedance at the off-resonance frequency.

Then the complex power (apparent power) for the circuit is given by:

##p = V~I^* = V ⋅ \frac{V}{(R + jX)^*} = V^2 \frac{R + jX}{R^2 +X^2}##

where ##I^*## means the complex conjugate of ##I##.

Now, the real power dissipated is the real component of the complex power. Setting this equal to our desired value:

##\frac{V^2}{2R} = V^2 \frac{R}{R^2 +X^2}##

Solving for the reactance we find that ##X = R##. This means that the impedance has a value ##Z = R (1 + j)##, which has a phase angle of 45°. The current, which is V/Z will have an angle of -45°. The cosine of -45° is ##\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##, so that is the power factor.

Note that the reactance could be positive or negative (net inductive or net capacitive reactance), and that the power factor will be the same since ##~~~cos(-45°) = cos(45°) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy and cnh1995
Here's my two cents..
At resonance,
Pr=VIr..(cosΦ=1)
At non-resonant frequency,
Pnr=VInrcosΦ
But Pr=2Pnr
So,
VIr=2VInrcosΦ
∴Ir=2InrcosΦ
∴V/R=2*(V/Z)cosΦ
...(R remains same in both the cases)
∴Z/R=2cosΦ
Since R/Z is cos Φ, we can directly write,
2cos2Φ=1
∴cosΦ=1/√2=0.7071
(=√2/2 as given in the answer)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy and gneill
Nice. That works. It's great to see variations!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995
gneill said:
A complete solution is offered.

At resonance the current is in phase with the voltage source, and the power factor is 1. In that case the power dissipated is simply

##P_o = \frac{V^2}{R}~~~##where ##R## is the circuit resistance and ##V## the fixed voltage.

We are looking for the power factor for the situation where the dissipated power drops by a factor of two. That is,

## P = \frac{P_o}{2} = \frac{V^2}{2R}##

Off-resonance there will be a net reactance, X. We won't worry about the individual reactances of the inductance and capacitance, only their net effect. Let:

##Z = R + j X## be the impedance at the off-resonance frequency.

Then the complex power (apparent power) for the circuit is given by:

##p = V~I^* = V ⋅ \frac{V}{(R + jX)^*} = V^2 \frac{R + jX}{R^2 +X^2}##

where ##I^*## means the complex conjugate of ##I##.

Now, the real power dissipated is the real component of the complex power. Setting this equal to our desired value:

##\frac{V^2}{2R} = V^2 \frac{R}{R^2 +X^2}##

Solving for the reactance we find that ##X = R##. This means that the impedance has a value ##Z = R (1 + j)##, which has a phase angle of 45°. The current, which is V/Z will have an angle of -45°. The cosine of -45° is ##\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##, so that is the power factor.

Note that the reactance could be positive or negative (net inductive or net capacitive reactance), and that the power factor will be the same since ##~~~cos(-45°) = cos(45°) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##.

Why do you set ##I=\frac{V}{R-JX}## instead of ##\frac{V}{R+JX}## In other words, why use the complex conjugate and not Z as it is?
 
fahraynk said:
Why do you set ##I=\frac{V}{R-JX}## instead of ##\frac{V}{R+JX}## In other words, why use the complex conjugate and not Z as it is?
Because the complex power is given by ##P = V I^*##. See, for example: An Introduction to Electric Circuit Theory by G. Williams, section 5.8. Since the V that we are using here is purely real, the way to form the complex conjugate is to change the sign of the imaginary term in the impedance in the denominator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
31K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K