Beam in specific photon number state?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a beam of light can be objectively in a specific photon number state (Fock state), such as |2⟩, or if this characterization is dependent on the observer or detection conditions. The conversation explores the nature of light beams, including coherent states, thermal light, and the conditions under which specific photon number states can be defined.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a beam of light is typically in a coherent state or thermal state, rather than a specific Fock state.
  • Others argue that the mean photon number and the state of the light beam depend on the detection time, suggesting that the exact state can vary based on these conditions.
  • A participant questions how a pair of photons can constitute a beam, emphasizing that a beam is a stream of photons.
  • There is a discussion about the possibility of creating approximate Fock states that follow a specific path, although this is noted to be challenging.
  • One participant claims that a beam with fixed time spacing between photons can be defined as a photon number state, while another counters that this leads to states of single prepared photons rather than a coherent beam state.
  • Concerns are raised about the resolution of detectors and how it affects the characterization of the photon states in a beam.
  • There is a clarification that a segment of a beam may consist of multiple independent single-photon states rather than a collective multi-photon state.
  • Participants discuss the distinction between antibunched single-photon states and bunched m-photon states in the context of beam segments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a beam of light can be definitively classified as being in a specific photon number state, with multiple competing views and ongoing debate regarding the definitions and implications of photon states in relation to detection conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of "beam" and "photon number state," as well as unresolved questions about the implications of detection time and the nature of light states being discussed.

maxverywell
Messages
197
Reaction score
2
Can a beam of light be objectively in a specific photon number state (Fock state), let's say ##|2\rangle##? Or is it (the specification of the state) detector/observer dependent? I.e. we can only say that a beam of light is in a Fock state, but which exactly is detector dependent (detection time interval dependent).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A "beam of light" is not a Fock state but a coherent state (if you consider laser light) or (more common) thermal light, described by a statistical operator (e.g., black-body radiation for the radiation in a hot cavity).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Coherent light is a poissonian light and thermal light is super-poissonian. However there is also sub-poissonian light, e.g. photon number states. Thant's what I was referring to.

The thing is that the mean photon number depends on the detection time, and thus the exact state of the light beam is dependent on the detection time (or equivalently on the length of the beam piece that we are considering), either it is coherent, thermal or a Fock state.
 
maxverywell said:
Can a beam of light be objectively in a specific photon number state (Fock state), let's say |2⟩?
How can a pair of photons make a beam? A beam is always a stream of photons.

However, one can make (approximate) Fock states that follow (roughly) a particular path.
It is quite difficult to do so.
 
A. Neumaier said:
How can a pair of photons make a beam? A beam is always a stream of photons.

A beam of light containing a stream of photons with a fixed time spacing ##\Delta t## between them (whereas for a coherent light beam this time interval is random) is a photon number state.
If the detection time of a photo-counting detector is ##T=n \Delta t##, you will always count n photon and thus the state of beam is ##|n\rangle##. In other words, a beam segment of length ##n c\Delta t## (where ##c## is the speed of light) is in the photon number state ##|n\rangle ##. So this is objectively defined state, without referring to a specific detetor/detection time. My confusion was because of the ambiguity of the word beam without specifying it's length or detection time.
 
Last edited:
Just trying to follow along here, how does one create a beam of two photons a temporal distance delta t apart?

What is the resolution of the detector?
 
maxverywell said:
A beam of light containing a stream of photons with a fixed time spacing ##\Delta t## between them is a photon number state.
Well, this gives states of single prepared photons, not states of the beam. The beam is in a far more complicated time-dependent state oscillating between Fock states and the vacuum state.

Such single-photon states can be produced using ion traps and laser excitation; these are called photons on demand. See my slides Classical and quantum field aspects of light and references therein. For the preparation of specific multiphoton Fock states see, e.g., https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Smith52/publication/236038468_Experimental_generation_of_multi-photon_Fock_states/links/0deec53c650a715fe2000000.pdf .

maxverywell said:
If the detection time of a photo-counting detector is ##T=\Delta t##, you will always count one photon and thus the state of beam is ##|1\rangle##, whereas if ##T=2\Delta t## then it is ##|2\rangle## etc.
This is not true. You get two independent ##|1\rangle## photons, not a 2-photon state.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A. Neumaier said:
This is not true. You get two independent ##|1\rangle## photons, not a 2-photon state.

Hmm, it seems that you are right. So a segment ##n c \Delta t## of this beam is in state ##|1\rangle \cdots|1\rangle## (##n## times), rather than ##|n\rangle##.
So this beam is a stream of single-photon Fock states ##|1\rangle##.
In general, we could have a beam which is a stream of m-photon Fock states ##|m\rangle##, and a segment ##n c \Delta t## of such beam is in state ##|m\rangle\cdots |m\rangle## (##n## times).
The difference is that the stream of single-photon Fock states is antibunched, whereas m-photon Fock states are bunched.

E.g.
##...## (beam segment of six ##|1\rangle## photon states)
##..\hspace{0.2cm}..\hspace{0.2cm}..## (beam segment of three ##|2\rangle## photon states)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K