Beam in specific photon number state?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of light beams and their representation in specific photon number states, particularly Fock states. It is established that a beam of light is typically in a coherent or thermal state, but can approximate Fock states under certain conditions. The mean photon number is contingent on detection time, which influences whether the beam is classified as coherent, thermal, or a specific Fock state. The conversation also clarifies that a segment of a beam can be defined as a photon number state, such as |n⟩, based on the detection time and spacing of photons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fock states and photon number states
  • Knowledge of coherent and thermal light properties
  • Familiarity with photo-counting detectors and their resolution
  • Basic principles of quantum optics and light behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the generation of specific multiphoton Fock states using ion traps and laser excitation
  • Explore the statistical properties of coherent, thermal, and sub-poissonian light
  • Learn about the implications of detection time on photon counting and state classification
  • Investigate experimental techniques for preparing single-photon states on demand
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and researchers in quantum optics looking to deepen their understanding of photon number states and their applications in experimental setups.

maxverywell
Messages
197
Reaction score
2
Can a beam of light be objectively in a specific photon number state (Fock state), let's say ##|2\rangle##? Or is it (the specification of the state) detector/observer dependent? I.e. we can only say that a beam of light is in a Fock state, but which exactly is detector dependent (detection time interval dependent).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A "beam of light" is not a Fock state but a coherent state (if you consider laser light) or (more common) thermal light, described by a statistical operator (e.g., black-body radiation for the radiation in a hot cavity).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Coherent light is a poissonian light and thermal light is super-poissonian. However there is also sub-poissonian light, e.g. photon number states. Thant's what I was referring to.

The thing is that the mean photon number depends on the detection time, and thus the exact state of the light beam is dependent on the detection time (or equivalently on the length of the beam piece that we are considering), either it is coherent, thermal or a Fock state.
 
maxverywell said:
Can a beam of light be objectively in a specific photon number state (Fock state), let's say |2⟩?
How can a pair of photons make a beam? A beam is always a stream of photons.

However, one can make (approximate) Fock states that follow (roughly) a particular path.
It is quite difficult to do so.
 
A. Neumaier said:
How can a pair of photons make a beam? A beam is always a stream of photons.

A beam of light containing a stream of photons with a fixed time spacing ##\Delta t## between them (whereas for a coherent light beam this time interval is random) is a photon number state.
If the detection time of a photo-counting detector is ##T=n \Delta t##, you will always count n photon and thus the state of beam is ##|n\rangle##. In other words, a beam segment of length ##n c\Delta t## (where ##c## is the speed of light) is in the photon number state ##|n\rangle ##. So this is objectively defined state, without referring to a specific detetor/detection time. My confusion was because of the ambiguity of the word beam without specifying it's length or detection time.
 
Last edited:
Just trying to follow along here, how does one create a beam of two photons a temporal distance delta t apart?

What is the resolution of the detector?
 
maxverywell said:
A beam of light containing a stream of photons with a fixed time spacing ##\Delta t## between them is a photon number state.
Well, this gives states of single prepared photons, not states of the beam. The beam is in a far more complicated time-dependent state oscillating between Fock states and the vacuum state.

Such single-photon states can be produced using ion traps and laser excitation; these are called photons on demand. See my slides Classical and quantum field aspects of light and references therein. For the preparation of specific multiphoton Fock states see, e.g., https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Smith52/publication/236038468_Experimental_generation_of_multi-photon_Fock_states/links/0deec53c650a715fe2000000.pdf .

maxverywell said:
If the detection time of a photo-counting detector is ##T=\Delta t##, you will always count one photon and thus the state of beam is ##|1\rangle##, whereas if ##T=2\Delta t## then it is ##|2\rangle## etc.
This is not true. You get two independent ##|1\rangle## photons, not a 2-photon state.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A. Neumaier said:
This is not true. You get two independent ##|1\rangle## photons, not a 2-photon state.

Hmm, it seems that you are right. So a segment ##n c \Delta t## of this beam is in state ##|1\rangle \cdots|1\rangle## (##n## times), rather than ##|n\rangle##.
So this beam is a stream of single-photon Fock states ##|1\rangle##.
In general, we could have a beam which is a stream of m-photon Fock states ##|m\rangle##, and a segment ##n c \Delta t## of such beam is in state ##|m\rangle\cdots |m\rangle## (##n## times).
The difference is that the stream of single-photon Fock states is antibunched, whereas m-photon Fock states are bunched.

E.g.
##...## (beam segment of six ##|1\rangle## photon states)
##..\hspace{0.2cm}..\hspace{0.2cm}..## (beam segment of three ##|2\rangle## photon states)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K