Does computer software/the internet/information have mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bradfordly1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Information itself does not possess mass or energy; however, it requires a minimum amount of mass and energy as a carrier. The storage and manipulation of information necessitate energy, which contributes to the mass of the storage system, albeit negligibly. Estimates indicate that the mass of all electrons constituting the internet at any moment is approximately 50 grams, while transmitting the entire internet would require around 64 grams of mass due to energy encoding. The calculations reveal that it would take 500 years to transmit the entire internet, with the fiber needed weighing approximately 1.55x10^20 pounds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bekenstein Bound
  • Familiarity with energy-mass equivalence principles
  • Knowledge of data storage mechanisms and their energy requirements
  • Basic grasp of data transmission technologies, including fiber optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Bekenstein Bound on information theory
  • Study energy-mass equivalence in the context of modern computing
  • Explore advanced data storage technologies and their energy profiles
  • Investigate the efficiency of data transmission methods, particularly fiber optics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, computer scientists, data engineers, and anyone interested in the intersection of information theory and physical principles.

Bradfordly1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Does computer software/the internet/information in general have any mass? Or is it just pure energy?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
No. Neither. :smile:
 
Information to be stored or manipulated requires energy, any energy in the storage system contributes to its mass as does raising the temperature of the storage system. This effect is negligible in any calculations.
 
Different configurations of charge or magnetic or molecular arrangements in storage mediums represent different energies so in effect you can change the mass of a storage device depending on what is stored there. The amount of energy represented is negligible and may not be directly proportional to the amount of data stored. So information is not measurable in mass and the mass changes in typical devices is likely not measurable either. Also depending on how information is actually stored you may be decreasing the energy (and thus mass) when going from "blank" to "programmed".

To complicate matters a very small change in a typical modern storage mechanism could represent a very large change in the quantity of data stored.

BoB
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
There have been a few estimates that the mass of all of the moving electrons that make up the internet at any given time is about 50 grams.
 
There are two answers here. Assume the internet contains about 2000 petabytes of data - that is 2 million terabytes, or 16 billion gigabits.

2 million terabytes would fit onto about 500,000 pounds of solid state devices - assuming about 4 ounces per terabyte. That's data you could actually access. But it's not the answer you want.

If you transmitted the entire internet, how much energy (and thus mass) would be used to encode that data? Assume 16 billion gigabits of data, a 1 watt laser diode, and a 1 gigabit per second fiber line that is perfectly efficient, unbreakable and as long as needed. It would take 16 million kilowatt/hours to transmit the Internet. That's 5.76x10^13 Joules (1.6x10^7 kilowatt/hours) of energy to transmit the Internet through that cable. That works out to about 64 grams of mass for the energy encoding the Internet.

(corrected math)
It would take you 500 years to transmit the Internet. The fiber that would hold the Internet from start to finish would weigh in at 1.55x10^20 pounds (a hundred billion billion pounds). It would wrap around the Earth 1.23x10^14 times.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MalcolmB, newjerseyrunner and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
934
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K